期刊文献+

天麻野生品与栽培品的鉴别比较 被引量:3

Identification and Comparison of Natural Samples and Cultivated Samples of Gastrodia elata
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为天麻药材鉴别提供新的依据。方法:应用中药鉴定学、数理统计学方法对天麻药材的野生品和栽培品性状特征进行鉴别比较。结果:天麻野生品与栽培品在药材基本性状、环节纹的数目、环节纹的节距(节间长度)以及节上点数(点状潜伏芽的数目)方面均有一定差异。随着栽培品的代数增加,野生品与栽培品的差异也随之增大。结论:天麻野生品的基本性状、环节纹形态与栽培品存在着明显区别,尤其是栽培品2代、3代以后更为明显。 OBJECTIVE:To provide a new basis for the identification of Gastrodia elata.METHODS:The characteristics ofnatural samples and cultivated samples of G.elata were identified and compared using pharmacognosy and mathematical statistics.RESULTS:The study showed that there were some differences in characteristics,ring-shaped node numbers,internode distance,and the number of latent bud among natural sample and cultivated samples of G.elata.CONCLUSION:There are significant differ-ences in basic characteristics and the ring-shaped nodes between G.elata natural samples and G.elata cultivated samples,especial-ly the cultivated sample after second generation,third generation.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第19期1804-1805,共2页 China Pharmacy
关键词 天麻 野生品 栽培品 环节纹 鉴别 Gastrodia elata Natural sample Cultivated sample Ring-shaped nodes Identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献3

共引文献5

同被引文献252

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部