期刊文献+

正畸治疗中两种关闭拔牙间隙方法的比较

Clinical analysis of two orthodontic treatment methods of extraction space closed
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比应用方丝弓矫治器与直丝弓矫治器关闭拔牙间隙恢复时间,评价方丝弓矫治器与直丝弓矫治器的临床治疗效果。方法选取2002-2004年间应用方丝弓或者直丝弓完成双颌固定矫治器治疗的正畸患者60例,利用PAR指数对患者治疗前后模型进行测量,并记录患者治疗前后的PAR总分值及差值,将患者按照拔牙或非拔牙正畸治疗方式结合治疗前测量PAR总分值相同者分成方丝弓组和直丝弓组,每组30例,对两组患者的测量数据进行统计学分析;结果两种治疗方法在关闭拔牙间隙时在所用时间上相比直丝弓组比方丝弓组疗程要短,直丝弓组后牙排列效果比方丝弓组好,PAR分值较方丝弓组低(P<0.01),直丝弓组治疗疗程平均缩短了近4个月。两组患者治疗后其余各项PAR分值和患者治疗前后的PAR差值均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论直丝弓矫治器在治疗关闭拔牙间隙过程中对牙齿排列定位较准确,治疗疗程上较方丝弓矫治器短,矫治效率比方丝弓高。 Objective To compare the application of edgewise appliance and straight wire appliance recovery time of extraction space closure,evaluating edgewise appliance and straight wire appliance clinical outcomes.Methods Between 2002 to 2004 in a hospital dental applications edgewise or straight wire fixed appliances complete the bimaxillary orthodontic treatment of 60 patients,the use of PAR index model of the patient before and after treatment were measured and recorded patients' PAR and the difference between the total score,patients in accordance with the extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment combined with measurement of PAR total scores before treatment were divided into the same group and the edgewise straight wire group,30 cases in each of the two groups,patients for statistical analysis of measurement data.Results The two treatment methods in the extraction space closure time when compared to the use of straight wire treatment group for example,wire groups should be short,straight wire group for example,after the effect of wire teeth arrangement group is better,PAR scores were lower than the edgewise(P0.01),straight wire group therapy sessions reduced by an average of nearly 4 months.Two groups of patients after treatment PAR score and the rest of the patients before and after the PAR was no significant difference(P0.05). Conclusions The straight wire appliance in the treatment of extraction space closed during the positioning of the teeth arranged was more accurate than edgewise appliance,and has short corse and high efficiency.
作者 王海燕
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2011年第4期77-78,81,共3页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 方丝弓矫治器 直丝弓矫治器 PAR指数 Edgewise appliance Straight wire appliance PAR index
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1杨新海 曾祥龙.直丝弓排齐与整平阶段切牙唇倾和支抗的研究.现代口腔医学杂志,2009,12(02):20-21.
  • 2曾祥龙.口腔正畸直丝弓矫治技术[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2004.161.
  • 3Roger MD, varunk, Norman DJ. Changes in soft tissue profile of Africa Americans follwing extraction treatment [J]. Angel Orthod ,2005,65 ( 4 ) : 285-294.
  • 4方刚,徐京燕,骆英.应用PAR指数评价不同拔牙方式矫治安氏II类1分类错的疗效[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(1):31-33. 被引量:8

二级参考文献6

  • 1孙晓卫,许天民.应用PAR指数评价不同拔牙方式矫治后牙关系的改善效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(2):259-261. 被引量:8
  • 2Richmond S,Shaw WC,O'Brien KD,et al.The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating):reliability and validity[J].Eur J Orthod,1992,14:125-139.
  • 3Casko JS,Vaden JL,Kokich VG,et al.Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1998,114:589-599.
  • 4Buchanan IB,Russell JI,Clark JD.Practical application of the PAR index:an illustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques[J].Br J Orthod,1996,23:351-357.
  • 5McMullan RE,Doubleday B,Muir JD,et al.Development of a treatment outcome standard as a result of a clinical audit of the outcome of fixed appliance therapy undertake by hospital-based consultant orthodontists in the UK[J].Br Dent J,2003,194:81-84.
  • 6缪耀强,施熙嘉,刘从华.应用PAR指数对332例错畸形矫治结果的评估[J].口腔正畸学,2001,8(1):9-12. 被引量:13

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部