期刊文献+

培美曲塞与DP方案在非小细胞肺癌二线治疗中临床疗效观察

Clinical observation of pemetrexed and DP regimen in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较DP方案与培美曲塞在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗中的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法 NSCLC患者27例,分别接受DP方案和培美曲塞两种方案的治疗,其中培美曲塞组13例,DP组14例,治疗2个周期后分别评价疗效和毒副反应。结果有效率培美曲塞组为23.1%,DP组为28.6%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);主要毒副反应均为骨髓抑制、消化道反应等。结论 DP方案和培美曲塞治疗晚期NSCLC都具有较好的疗效;毒副反应不同,培美曲塞或许是一种更好的选择。 Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity between DP regimen and pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods 27 cases with advanced NSCLC were divided into two groups.13 cases received pemetrexed regimen chemotherapy and 14 cases adopted DP regimen chemotherapy.The efficacy and toxicities were evaluated after two cycles.Results The response rate of the pemetrexed group and DP group were 23.1%and 28.6 % respectively(P0.05).The major toxicities were bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reaction.Conclusion Both DP regimen and pemetrexed have shown fairly good result in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.Their toxicities are different.Pemetrexed may be a better choice.
作者 张晓东
出处 《淮海医药》 CAS 2011年第3期211-212,共2页 Journal of Huaihai Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺 多西他赛 顺铂 培美曲塞 Carcinoma non-small-cell lung Docetaxel Cisplatin Pemetrexed
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Pirker R, Minar W. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer[ J ]. Front Radiat Ther Onco1,2010,42 : 157-163.
  • 2朱韧,倪健.多西他赛联合顺铂或卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(4):320-322. 被引量:26
  • 3Demarinis F, Paul S, Hanna N, et al. Survival Update for the Phase Ⅲ Study of Pemetrexed vs Docetaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [ J]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24(1so) :7133.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bunn PA Jr:Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:who,what,when,why[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20(18 Suppl):20S-33S.
  • 2Rosll R,Gatzemeier U,Betticher DC,et al.Phase Ⅲ randomised trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:a cooperative multinational trial[J].Ann Oncol,2002,13(10):1539-1549.
  • 3Fossella F,Pereira JR,Von Pawel J,et al.Randomized,multinational,phase Ⅲ study of docetaxel plus platinum combination vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:The TAX326 Study Group[J].J Clin Oncol,2003,21(16):3016-3024.
  • 4Mazzanti P,Massacesi C,Rocchi MB,et al.Randomized,multicenter,phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Lung Cancer,2003,41(1):81-89.
  • 5Go RS,Adjei AA.Review of the comparative pharmacology and clinical activity of cisplatin and carboplatin[J].J Clin Oncol,1999,17(1):409-422.
  • 6Wani MC,Taylor HL,Wall ME,et al.Plant antitumor agents,VI.The isolation and structure of taxol,a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from taxus brevifolia[J].J Am Chem Soc,1971,93(9):2325-2327.
  • 7Hamel E,Lin CM,Johns DG.Tubulin-dependent biochemical assay for the antineoplastic agent taxol and applications to measurements of the drug in the serum[J].Cancer Treat Rep,1982,66(6):1381-1386.
  • 8Horwitz SB,Cohen D,Rao S,et al.Taxol:mechanisms of action and resistance[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,15(1):55-61.
  • 9Comer AL,Goa KL.Docetaxel:a review of its use in non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Drugs Aging,2000,17(1):53-80.
  • 10Paesmans M,Sculier JP,Libert P,et al.Prognostic factors for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:univariate and multivariate analysis including recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms in 1052 patients[J].J Clin Oncol,1995,13(5):1221-1230.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部