老子其书之争及其启示

Different Ideas on Laozi

史料记录的不甚全面,以及历史上多个版本的描述,使得人们对于《老子》一书产生了诸多疑问,由此产生了战国派和春秋派,围绕《老子》一书的思想、语词以及所涉及的历史史实等对其所产生的年代进行了争论,这些争论表面上是对史实的争论,但同时表现出了争论者思维方式的局限性,启示人们对于史实的证明要从实际出发,多方求证,务必得出全面合理的认识。

There are many different ideas,mainly ＂Warring-States＂ school and ＂Spring-Autumn＂ school,about ＂Laozi＂ due to inadequate historical records and multiple versions.They argued about the thought,words,as well as historical facts and time.The different ideas are the argument about historical facts on the surface;on the other hand,it is the result of the limitation of thinking method.Historical study needs multiple evidences based on the facts.