期刊文献+

关系类别及其学习机制 被引量:7

Relational Category and Learning Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关系类别是指类别的成员身份由一个共同的关系结构决定。其意义来自于其与其他实体的关系或其内部的一系列成分间的关系,关系类别强调关系结构的系统性。文章重点介绍和评述了相似性种类,关系类别和实体类别的联系和差异,关系类别的学习过程及机制———结构—映射理论。未来的研究方向主要是探索新的研究范式,以深入理解关系类别的学习;深入探讨校准和映射过程与其他基本认知过程的相互作用,为关系类别的学习提供更一致的认知观点。 Relational category is defined that category membership is decided by a common structure of relations,and its significance is the relationship with other entities or the relationship of a series of internal components.Relational category emphasizes the systematicity of relational structure.The current review focuses on the types of similarity,the relation and difference between entity category and relational category,the learning process of relational category as well as the learning mechanism-structure-mapping theory.The direction of future research is to explore the new research paradigm of categorization,deeply understand the learning of relational category,explore how the process of alignment and mapping interacts with other basic cognitive processes,and provide a more consistent view of cognition about the learning of relational category.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2011年第2期138-143,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(06JJDXLX003)
关键词 关系类别 相似性 结构校准 结构映射 relational category similarity structural alignment structural mapping
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Todd P,Gigerenzer G.Environments that make us smart:Ecological rationality.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2007,16(3):167-171.
  • 2Gentner D.Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,1983,7:155-170.
  • 3Gentner D.The mechanisms of analogical learning.In:Vosniadou S,Ortony A.Eds.Similarity and analogical reasoning.London:Cambridge University Press,1989:199-241.
  • 4Gentner D.The development of relational category knowledge.In:Gershkoff-Stowe L,Rakison D H.Eds.Building object categories in developmental time.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,2005:245-275.
  • 5Richland L E,Morrison R G,Holyoak K J.Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2006,94:249-273.
  • 6Megan J,Bulloch,Opfer J.What makes relational reasoning smart? Revisiting the perceptual-to-relational shift in the development of generalization.Developmental Science,2009,12:114-122.
  • 7Feldman J.Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.Nature,2000,407(6804):630-633.
  • 8Feldman J.A catalog of Boolean concepts.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,2003,47(1):75-89.
  • 9Feldman J.The simplicity principle in human concept learning.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2003,12(6):227-232.
  • 10Feldman J.An algebra of human concept learning.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,2006,50(4):339-368.

同被引文献96

  • 1BLAIR M, HOMA D L. Integrating Novel Dimensions to Eliminate Category Exceptions: When More is Less [J]. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31(2): 258-271.
  • 2GENTNER D, Kurtz K. Relational Categories [C] //AHN W K, GOLDSTONE R L, LOVE B C, MARKMAN A B, WOLFF P W. Categorization Inside and Outside the Lab. Washington, DC: APA, 2005: 151-175.
  • 3TODD P, GIGERENZER G. Environments That Make Us Smart: Ecological Rationality [J]. Current Directions in Psy chological Science, 2007, 16(3): 167-171.
  • 4FELDMAN J. The Simplicity Principle in Human Concept Learning [J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2003, 12(6): 227-232.
  • 5NOSOFSKY R M, STANTON R D, ZAKI S R. Procedural Interference in Perceptual Classification: Implicit Learning or Cognitive Complexity [J]. Memory &Cognition, 2005, 33(7): 1256-1271.
  • 6LOMOBROZO T. Simplicity and Probability in Causal Explanation [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2007, 55(3) : 232-257.
  • 7POTHOS E M, Close J. One or Two Dimensions in Spontaneous Classification: A Simplicity Approach [J]. Cognition, 2008: 107(2): 581-602.
  • 8DEAK G, BAUER P J. The Effects of Task Comprehension on Preschoolers' and Adults' Categorization Choices [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1995, 60(3) : 393-427.
  • 9CLARK A. Language, Embodiment, and the Cognitive Niche[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (8), 2006: 370-374.
  • 10BEI.LER S, BENDER A. The Limits of Counting: Numerical Cognition between Evolution and Culture [J]. Science, 2008, 319(5860):213-215.

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部