期刊文献+

并购中员工离职原因的理论解读:一个文献综述 被引量:4

Studies on the Reasons of Employee Turnover in Mergers & Acquisitions:A Literature Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 并购中员工有更强的离职意愿和更高的离职率已经被充分证明,相关研究者继而对并购中员工离职原因进行了很多探讨,并使其成为并购中人力资源整合领域的一个核心研究问题。以往文献主要从三个理论视角对并购中员工离职原因予以研究,即相对地位理论、高层梯队观点、文化差异观点。相对地位理论从并购双方员工的关系属性来分析员工离职问题,高层梯队观点则从并购企业高层管理团队背景特征分析管理者的离职可能,文化差异观点是从并购双方的文化差异和文化冲突角度来解读员工的离职意愿。 It has been found that the acquisitions. Thus,researchers began to employee has a stronger turnover intention in mergers and explore the reasons. Now, the issue has become one of the hot issues in the area of human resource integration in mergers and acquisitions. The previous research on that mainly focuses on three approaches: relative standing theory, upper echelons perspective, and cultural difference perspective. From the view of relative standing theory, attributes of the relationship between the acquiring firm and acquired firm are the key effect factors of employee turnover intention, In the UEP approach, background characteristics of the top management team of the acquiring firm and acquired firm can predict their turnover intention or turnover behavior. In the perspective of cultural difference,cultural differences and conflicts between the acquiring firm and the acquired firm are the main effect factors of employ turnover intention.
作者 颜士梅
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期180-189,共10页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672046) 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70732001)
关键词 并购 离职 相对地位理论 高层梯队观点 文化差异 mergers & acquisitions turnover relative standing theory upper echelons perspective cultural difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1H. I,evinson," A Psychologist Diagnoses Merger Failures," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 (1970), pp. 84 - 101.
  • 2D. M. Schweiger & Y. Weber,"Strategies for Managing Human Resources during Mergers and Acquisitions: An Empirical Investigation,"Human Resource Planning, Vol. 12, No. 2 ( 1989 ), pp. 69 - 96.
  • 3M. C. Jensen & W. H. Meckling,"Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure ,"Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4 ( 1976 ), pp. 305 - 360.
  • 4E. F. Fama,"Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm,"Journal o.f Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 2 (1980),pp. 288-307.
  • 5J. P. Walsh," Top Management Turnover Following Mergers and Acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 9. No. 2(1988) ,pp. 173 - 183.
  • 6J. P. Walsh,"Doing a Deal: Merger and Acquisition Negotiations and Their Impact upon Target Company Top Management Turnover,"Strategic Management Journal ,Vol. 10,No. 4(1989) ,pp. 307 - 322.
  • 7J. A. Krug & W. H. Hegarty,"postacquisition Turnover among U. S. Top Management Teams: An Analysis of the Effects of Foreign vs. Domestic Acquisitions of U. S. Targets," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 8(1997) ,pp. 667 - 675.
  • 8A. A. Cannella & D. C. Hambrick,"Effects of Executive Departures on the Performance of Acquired Firms," Strategic" Management Journal ,Vol. 14,No. S1(1993),pp. 137 - 152.
  • 9T. Kiessling,M. Harvey & J. T. Heames,"Acquisition Issues: Operational Changes to the Acquired Firm's Top Management Team and Subsequent Organizational Per~ormance," Journal of Leadership & Orgenizational Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2008), pp. 287 - 302.
  • 10F. Vermeulen & H. Barkema,"Learning through Acquisitions,"Academy of Management Journal Vol. 44 No. 3(2001) ,pp. 457 - 477.

同被引文献77

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部