期刊文献+

三种不同术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床研究 被引量:6

The clinical research of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析三种不同术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效。方法:将102例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者随机分为3组,A组行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)+胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile ductexploration,LCBDE);B组行传统开腹胆囊切除术(open cholecystectomy,OC)+胆总管探查术(open common bile duct explora-tion,OCBDE);C组行LC联合内镜下Oddi括约肌切开取石术(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)。对比分析3组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛程度、术后肠功能恢复时间、并发症发生率、术后恢复工作时间、术后T管拔除时间、住院时间等情况。结果:A组手术指标明显优于B、C两组。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查术安全可行。 Objective:To compare the effectiveness of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.Methods:One hundred and two patients with cholecystolithiasis choledocholithiasis were randomly divided into three groups,group A:laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LC+LCBDE),group B:cholecystoctomy and common bile duct exploration under laparotomy(OC+OCBDE),group C:LC and endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+EST).Then the operative time,blood loss,pain score,time for resumption of intestinal function,incidence of postoperative complications,the time for returning to work after surgery,duration of T-tube and the average time in hospital among 3 groups were compared.Results:Group A was significantly superior to group B and C.Conclusions:LC and LCBDE is safe and feasible.Furthermore,it is minimally invasive.
机构地区 宝鸡市中心医院
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2011年第4期289-290,共2页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 胆囊结石病 胆总管结石 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 胆总管探查术 Cholecystolithiasis Choledocholithiasis Cholecystectomy laparoscopic Common bile duct exploration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1陈安平,肖宏,温宜清,刘安,田刚,宋安宁,高珂,黄纪伟.腹腔镜胆总管探查术的临床应用(附822例报告)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(6):365-366. 被引量:41
  • 2胡智明,邹寿椿,赵大建,张成武.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏的原因及对策[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2005,17(4):320-321. 被引量:27
  • 3Way LW,Srewart L,Gantert W,et al.Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries:analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective[J].Ann Surg,2003,237(4):460-469.
  • 4Redaelli CA,Büchler MW,Schilling MK,et al.High coincidence of Mirizzi syndrome and gallbladder carcinoma[J].Surgery,1997,121(1):58-63.
  • 5Johnson LW,Sehon JK,Lee WC,et al.Mirizzi's syndrome:experience from a muli-institutional review[J].Am Surg,2001,67(1):11-14.
  • 6Robinson TN,Stiegmann GV,Durham JD,et al.Management of major bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Surg Endosc,2001,15(12):1381-1385.
  • 7Agarwala N, Liu CY. Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy:left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space-a review of 918 procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2005, 12:55-61.
  • 8Kwon AH, Inui H, Imamura A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy in patients with a previous gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2001, 193:614- 619.
  • 9Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2001, 192: 478-491.
  • 10Munro MG. Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies,and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 14: 365-374.

共引文献93

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部