期刊文献+

我国城市公交服务治理模式与运营效率研究——以长三角城市群公交服务为例 被引量:21

Research on the Governance Mode and Operation Efficiency of Urban Bus Service——A Case Study of Yangtze Delta Region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市公交服务运营效率评价是政府选择治理模式的前提与依据,而明晰运营效率与其影响因素间的关系则是政府深化公交治理模式的理论依据。在比较政府经营模式和市场主导模式差异及探讨效率影响因素的基础上,以长三角城市群公交服务为研究样本,应用DEA方法测算城市间服务效率的差异,发现市场主导模式效率要优于政府经营模式,但各自的综合效率、技术效率和规模效率均值都不高。为剖析造成这种现象的原因,对公交服务效率的影响因素进行Tobit回归,结果表明市场竞争、企业规模与运营效率显著正相关,且市场竞争与运营效率间存在"倒U型"关系。因此,我国城市公交服务的改革应坚持市场化为导向,引入民营资本构建公有有限公司形式的国有民营模式,扩大企业规模和充分利用竞争手段,以提高企业运营效率。 The evaluation of the operation efficiency of bus service is the basis for government to choose its governance mode,and the relationship between operation efficiency and its influencing factors helps government do the advanced research on governance mode.Based on the comparison between authority initiative and market initiative modes and the analysis of their influencing factors,this paper takes the bus service in Yangtze Delta Region as an example and then uses DEA method to evaluate its service efficiency.It finds out that the efficiency of market initiative mode is higher than that of authority initiative mode,but the means of efficiencies of both two modes are low.In order to analyze the reasons,this paper constructs Tobit regression with some influencing factors,and the results show that improving market competition and increasing enterprise scale could perfect operation efficiency.Moreover,there is an 'inverted U' relationship between competition and efficiency.Therefore,the reform of public bus transportation in urban areas needs to be market-oriented and to construct a state-owned & private-running mode,ensuring market competition environment and scale economy to improve the operation efficiency of public bus transportation.
出处 《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 2011年第2期52-62,126,共11页 Journal of Public Management
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关课题(05JZD00018) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2010BCK002)
关键词 政府经营模式 市场主导模式 运营效率 国有民营模式 Authority Initiative Mode Market Initiative Mode Operation Efficiency State-Owned & Private-Running Mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1[美]E·S·萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 2余晖,秦虹.公私合作制的中国实验[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 3MAGNUS S. A Broad Performance Benchmark Based on Citizens Preferences [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2009, 80(4): 579-603.
  • 4WILLIAM R, ANNE Y B. Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2007, 41(2): 257-282.
  • 5OTTOZ E F G, DI G M .The Impact of Ownership on the Cost of Bus Service Provision:An Example from Italy[J]. Applied Economice, 2009, 41(3): 337-349.
  • 6ANDREA B, MARCELLA N, CARLO S. Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe [EB/OL]. (2010-1 -20) [2011 -2-27] http://istituti. unicatt.it/teoria._economica_metodi_quantitativi_ 160210.pdf.
  • 7VICENTE P, LOURDES T. Analysis of the Efficiency of Local Government Services Delivery: An Application to Urban Public Transport[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2001, 35(10): 929-944.
  • 8SUZANNE L, OLGA S. Reassessing Privatization Strategies 25 Years Later: Revisiting PenT and Babitsky Comparative Performance Study of Urban Bus Transit Service[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69(5 ) : 855-867.
  • 9.l F M K, BERT E. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69 (2) : 284-296.
  • 10魏军.城市公共交通民营化与政府管制--以兰州市为例[J].中国行政管理,2009(6):88-91. 被引量:10

二级参考文献61

共引文献557

同被引文献235

引证文献21

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部