期刊文献+

3项肿瘤标志物联合检测在肺癌诊断中的价值 被引量:4

The evaluation of three tumor markers in diagnosis of lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨联合检测血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平对肺癌的诊断价值。方法:用电化学发光法检测113例肺癌确诊患者、60例肺良性病变患者血清中CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE水平。结果:肺癌组CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE检测阳性率均明显高于肺良性病变组(P<0.01);CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE 3项联合检测肺癌的灵敏度为79.6%,明显高于单项检测肺癌的灵敏度(46.9%、46.9%和45.1%)和二项联合平行试验的诊断灵敏度(67.3%、70.8%和65.5%)。结论:CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE联合检测可明显提高对肺癌的诊断灵敏度,有利于肺癌的早期诊断。 Objective: To study the clinical significance of combination detection of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA21-1 and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with lung cancer. Methods: One hundred and thirteen cases of lung tumor patients and 60 patients with benign lung diseases were enrolled. Their serum levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE were detected by electro-chemi-luminescence assay. Results: The levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE in lung cancer group were significantly higher than those of control group (P〈0. 01). The sensitivity and specificity of measurement of three tumor markers in combination (79. 60/40) were significantly higher than that of combination of two tumor markers(67.3%,70. 8% and 65.5% in different combinations)and single tumor marker(46.9%,46. 9% and 45.1%). Conclusion: The combined measurement of serum CEA,CYFRA21-1 and NSE significantly increased the sensitivity for diagnosis of lung cancer, and therefore it provides useful information for early diagnosis of patients with lung cancer.
出处 《感染.炎症.修复》 2011年第1期43-45,共3页 Infection Inflammation Repair
关键词 肺癌 癌胚抗原 细胞角蛋白19片段 神经元特异性烯醇化酶 Lung cancer Careino-embryonic antigen CYFRA21-1 Neuron-specific enolase
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献42

共引文献141

同被引文献51

  • 1陈香丽,陈小燕.血清肿瘤标记物在肺癌诊断中的意义[J].临床肺科杂志,2004,9(6):590-592. 被引量:26
  • 2张凤平.血清CEA、SF和β_2-MG联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床价值[J].菏泽医学专科学校学报,2005,17(3):33-34. 被引量:1
  • 3Donnem T,Andersen S,A1 - Saad S, et al. Prognostic impact of an- giogenic markers in non - small cell lung cancer is related to tumor size[ J]. Clin Lung Cancer,2011,12 ( 2 ) : 106 - 115.
  • 4Bentzen SM, Buffa FM, Wilson GD. Multiple biomarker tissue rni- croarrays :bioinformatics and practical approaches[J] Cancer Me- tastasis Rev, 2008,27 ( 3 ) :481 - 494.
  • 5Bonner JA, Sloan JA, Rowland KW, et al. Significance of neuron - specific enolas levels before and during therapy for small cell lung cancer [ J ]. Clin Cancer Res,2000,6 ( 2 ) :597 - 601.
  • 6王克扬,贺文,何茜,王涛,赵丽琴,李晓强,李晨,李辉,肖国文.胸部DR影像后处理对肺结节检出的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(11):1727-1729. 被引量:7
  • 7Jin B,Huang AM,Zhong RB. The value of tumor markers in evaluating chemotherapy response and prognosis in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chemotherapy,2010,(06):417-423.
  • 8Lazarev SM,Massard Z,Reshetov AV. Role of biological tumor markers CEA,Cyfra-21,NSE,TU M2-PK in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer[J].Vestnik Khirurgii Imeni Ⅱ Grekova,2010,(01):39-43.
  • 9Donnem T,Andersen S,Al-Saad S. Prognostic impact of angiogenic markers in non-small-cell lung cancer is related to tumor size[J].Clinical Lung Cancer,2011,(02):106-115.
  • 10Shvets SI,Kogan EA,Kovalenko VL. Evaluation of malignancy ofsquamous cell lung cancer by clinico-morphological,immunohistochemical and prognostic study of tumor markers[J].Voprosy Onkologii,2009,(06):746-750.

引证文献4

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部