摘要
目的:探究社区老年人颌面部间隙感染的临床特点,设计合理的防治方案,降低发病率。方法:研究实验分为老年组[60岁以上,平均年龄(68±4)岁,共28例]与对照组[20～59岁,平均年龄(33±6)岁,共22例]。经过对患者基本情况、发病因素、感染部位、合并基础性疾病、有创治疗(切开、引流)、治愈时间等的调查,研究分析老年人颌面部间隙感染的临床特点。结果:老年组发病因素与对照组基本相同(主要是牙源性),但老年组以残根、残冠为主,对照组以智齿为主;老年组合并基础性疾病比例(20/28)高于对照组(3/22)(P<0.01);老年组有创治疗比例(11/28)高于对照组(3/22)(P<0.05),老年组治愈时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:加强口腔卫生宣传,根据老年人发病的自身特点,设计合理的防治方案。
Objective：To research community elderly maxillofacial infection between clinical characteristics and design the reasonable control schemes to reduce the morbidity.Methods：Research trials were divided into the elderly group [60 years old,average age（68±4） years old,28 cases] and control group [20-59 years old,average age（33±6） years old,22 cases].After the study of patients including basic conditions triggers,infected site,merger basic diseases,inasie therapy（incision and drainage）,cure time,this paper analyzed the elderly maxillofacial infection between the clinical features.Results：The disease factors were basically the same between the elderly group and the control group.（mainly was tooth source）,but the elderly group was primarily with the residual roots and residual crowns,while the control group were wisdom tooth.The proportion of elderly group（20/28） merged basic diseases was higher than the control group（3/22）（P0.01）,proportion of the elderly inasie therapy（November 28th） was higher than the control group（3/22）（P0.05）,and elderly cure longer than control group（P0.05）.Conclusion：We should strengthen propaganda,according to the elderly oral health of their own characteristics,design the reasonable control schemes.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2011年第13期38-39,共2页
China Modern Medicine
