证据损害理论:潜伏性毒物致害侵权诉讼中的可选择理论

The Theory of Damaging Evidence:Optional Theory in Masked Toxic Tort Litigation

在潜伏性毒物致害侵权诉讼中,由于经历时间久远、证据缺失以及造成损害结果的事实不确定等因素,对诉讼裁判的准确性造成极大困难。不确定性的存在以及后来法庭无法对事实进行裁定,有时是由于当事人的不当行为所致。这些不当行为人才应该对案件事实的不确定性以及相应的致错风险承担责任。是否应该让这些当事人承担这种证据损害的责任、其法律标准应该如何设置以及对于那些遭受证据损害者法律应该给予他们何种救济都是这种特殊侵权诉讼中可选择理论———证据损害理论所要探讨的重大议题。

In masked toxic tort litigation,the long time,the short of evidence and the uncertainty of the faces concerning damage,all these factors will cause great difficulties in achieving accuracy in judgment.The uncertainties and that the court is unable to judge the facts may be caused by the concerning parties' misconduct,thus the misconduct person shall take on the responsibility of the uncertainty and judging error in court decisions.Whether the concerning parties shall take on the responsibility of damaging the evidence or not,how to establish its standards and how to relieve the parties who suffered from evidence damage in law are all the major issues in the optional theory——the theory of evidence damage in such tort litigation.