期刊文献+

替吉奥联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌安全性评价 被引量:26

Safety Evaluation of TS-1 plus Oxaliplatin in the Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]评价替吉奥联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效和安全性。[方法]采用随机对照法,将36例进展期胃癌患者随机分为替吉奥联合奥沙利铂组(18例)和FOLFOX4组(18例),至少行2个周期化疗后评价疗效与不良反应。[结果]36例患者均可评价疗效,替吉奥联合奥沙利铂组CR1例(5.6%),PR7例(38.9%),SD6例(33.3%),PD4例(22.2%),有效率44.5%;FOLFOX4组PR6例(33.3%),SD10例(55.5%),PD2例(11.1%),有效率33.3%;两组有效率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.808,P=0.369)。两组主要不良反应为血液学毒性、胃肠道反应和神经系统毒性,其中FOLFOX4组恶心呕吐发生率显著高于替吉奥联合奥沙利铂组(χ2=4.485,P=0.034)。[结论]替吉奥联合奥沙利铂方案治疗进展期胃癌疗效与FOLFOX4方案相当,但耐受性较好。 [Purpose] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TS-1 plus oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.[Methods]Thirty-six cases with advanced gastric cancer were randomly divided into TS-1 plus oxaliplatin group (n=18) and FOLFOX4 group (n=18).The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated after at least two cycles of chemotherapy.[Results] Response was evaluable in all patients.Of 18 cases in TS-1 plus oxaliplatin group,1 case in CR(5.6%),7 cases in PR(38.9%),6 cases in SD (33.3%) and 4 cases in PD(22.2%) were found with response rate of 44.5%.Of 18 cases in FOLFOX4 group,6 cases in PR(33.3%),10 cases in SD(55.5%) and 2 cases in PD(11.1%) were found with response rate of 33.3%.There was no significant difference with response between the two groups(χ2=0.808,P=0.369) .The main toxicity in both groups was hematological toxicity,gastrointestinal reaction and nervous system toxicity.The incidence of nausea and vomiting in FOLFOX4 group was higher than that in TS-1 plus oxaliplatin group(χ2=4.485,P=0.034).[Conclusion] The response of TS-1 plus oxaliplatin regimen and FOLFOX4 regimen for advanced gastric cancer is similar,and the toxicity of TS-1 plus oxaliplatin regimen is tolerable.
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2011年第4期253-256,共4页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 胃肿瘤 药物疗法 替吉奥 奥沙利铂 gastric neoplasms drug therapy TS-1 oxaliplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Trotti A,Colevas AD, Seteser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003, 13(3):176-181.
  • 2Tanabe K. Suzuki T, Tokumoto N,et al.Combination therapy with doeetaxel and S-1 as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2010,8:40.
  • 3Higgie GD, Sommadossi JP, Cross DS, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and it metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile [J]. Cancer Res, 1987,47 (8): 2203-2206.
  • 4Beck A, Etienne MC, Cheradame S, et al. A role for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase in tumor sensitivity to fluorouracil [J]. Eur J Cancer, 1994,30A(10): 1517-1522.
  • 5Fukushima M, Shimamoto Y, Kato T,et al. Anticancer activity and toxicity of S-1, an oral combination of tegafur and two biochemical modulators, compared with continuous i.v. of 5-fluorouracil [J].Anticancer Drugs, 1998,9 (9): 817-823.
  • 6Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical moderators [J]. Anticancer Drugs, 1996,7(5): 548-557.
  • 7Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group [J]. Oncology, 2000, 58 (3): 191- 197.
  • 8Ajani JA, Rodriquez W, Bodoky G, et al. Muhicenter phase Ⅲ comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010,28(9): 1547-1553.
  • 9Fuse N, Fukuda H, Yamada Y, et al. Updated results of randomized phase Ⅲ study of 5-fluorouracil alone versus combination of irinotecan and cisplatin versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG 9912) [J]. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts), 2009, 27(15s):4514.
  • 10Kawai H, Ohtsu A, Boku N, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of S-1 in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in clinical practice: results from a post-marketing survey[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2003,6 (Suppl 1):19-23.

同被引文献148

引证文献26

二级引证文献182

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部