期刊文献+

乳腺影像报告和数据系统在国人女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用价值 被引量:40

Value of breast imaging reporting and data system in Chinese breast cancer screening
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估分类在国人女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用价值.方法 搜集2009年8月至12月参加乳腺癌筛查项目中行乳腺X线摄影的3483名妇女资料,参照BI-RADS标准对乳腺评估分类,对于疾病的诊断最终以组织病理结果为金标准,计算BI-RADS评估分类的准确度、敏感度、特异度及BI-RADS各类的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV).结果 3483名受检妇女乳腺组成中脂肪型、散在腺体型、不均匀致密型和高度致密型分别有267、1245、1890和81名.进行BI-RADS评估分类,0~5类分别为273(7.8%)、1011(29.0%)、1741(50.0%)、383(11.0%)、59(1.7%)和16(0.5%)名.71例受检者的77个乳腺病变经病理证实,包括恶性病变29例,良性病变48例.BI-RADS评估分类的准确度为63.6%(49/77),敏感度为93.1%(27/29),特异度为45.8%(22/48),BI-RADS总体PPV为50.9%(27/53),0类、4类和5类的PPV分别为25.0%(1/4)、36.4%(12/33)和87.5%(14/16),2类、3类的NPV分别为90.9%(10/11)和100.0%(12/12).结论 乳腺X线摄影应用BI-RADS评估分类可以有效地预测乳腺恶性病变,在国人女性乳腺癌筛查应用中有一定价值. Abstract:Objective To study the value of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)in Chinese breast cancer screening. Methods A total number of 3483 women participated in breast cancer screening with mammography in Hexi district in Tianjin from August to December 2009, which was organized by ministry of public health. BI-RADS assessment categories and recommendations were compared with histological findings. The precision, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results Among 3483 screening mammography cases, 267 were almost entirely fat breast, 1245 were scauered fibroglandular, 1890 were dense and 81 extremely dense.There were 1011 patients(29.0%) with category 1, 1741 (50.0%) with category 2, 383 (11.0%) with category 3, 59 patients(1. 7%) with category 4 and 16 (0. 5%) with category 5 according to BI-RADS assessment categories. Totally, 71 women with 77 lesions were confirmed by histological examinations. There were 29 malignant and 48 benign lesions. The diagnostic precision, sensitivity, specificity of BI-RADS were 63. 6% (49/77) , 93. 1% (27/29) and 45.8% (22/48) . The general PPV of BI-RADS was 50. 9%(27/53). The PPV of categories 0, 4, 5 were 25.0% (1/4), 36. 4% (12/33) and 87. 5% (14/16). The NPV of categories 2 and3 were90.9% (10/11), 100.0% (12/12). Conclusions B1-RADS is of much value in assessing the breast malignancy. It is applicable in Chinese breast cancer screening.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期353-357,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房X线摄影术 图像处理 计算机辅助 Breast neoplasms Mammography Image processing,computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1American College of Radiology.Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BI-RADS atlas).4ed.Reston:Am Coll Radiol,2003:1-257.
  • 2Wiratkapun C,Wibulpolprasert B,Lert sithichai P.Breast cancer in patients initially assigned as BI-RADS category 3.J Med Assoc Thai,2006,89:834-839.
  • 3Liberman L,Abranson AF,Squires FB,et al.The breast imaging reporting and data system:positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.Am J Roentgenol,1998,171:35-40.
  • 4Orel SG,Kay N,Reynolds C,et al.BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.Radiology,1999,211:845-850.
  • 5Lacquement MA,Mitchell D,Hollingsworth AB.Positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system.J Am Coll Surg,1999,189:34-40.
  • 6Varas X,Leborgne JH,Leborgne F,et al.Revisiting the mammographic fiollow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.Am J Roentgenol,2002,179:691-695.
  • 7Taplin H,Ichikawa E,Kerlikowske K,et al.Concordance of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography.Radiology,2002,222:529-535.
  • 8Lehman C,Holt S,Peacock S,et al.Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists:concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.AJR,2002,179:15-20.
  • 9Tuncbilek I,Ozdemir A,Gültekin S,et al.Clinical outcome aasessment in mammography:an audit of 7506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.Diagn Interv Radiol,2007,13:183-187.
  • 10Caplan IS,Blackman D,Nadel M,et al.Coding mammograms using the classification " probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested".A JR,1999,172:339-342.

二级参考文献46

共引文献70

同被引文献270

引证文献40

二级引证文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部