摘要
目的探讨开腹手术与腹腔镜手术两种治疗方式对子宫肌瘤的疗效。方法对2004年1月～2008年12月来我科住院的腹腔镜手术治疗与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的患者共220例患者的临床资料进行收集，对两组之间的手术情况进行分析。结果围手术期，两组之间在手术时间、出血量、排气时间、术后病率、住院天数之间均存在差异，且差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术具有诸多优点，值得在临床上进一步的推广。但是其并不能代替开腹手术。
Objective ： Explore open surgery and laparoscopic surgery two treatment way for uterine fibroids curative effect. Methods： On January 2004 - December 2008 to I branch hospitalized laparoscopic surgery treatment and traditional open surgery treatment of uterine flesh tumour of 220 patients with clinical data of two groups of collect, analyze the surgery between Results： Perioperative, between two groups in the operative time, blood loss, exhaust time, postoperative disease rate, the length of days, and there are differences between a statistically significant difference （P 〈 0.01）. Conclusions： Laparoscopic resection of myoma of uterus are many advantages, it is worth popularizing clinically further. But it cannot replace open surgery.
关键词
子宫肿瘤
腹腔镜
开腹手术
Uterine tumor
Laparoscopic
Open surgery
