期刊文献+

古代史传“虚构”说辨正 被引量:1

Refutation of "Fiction" Theory of Ancient Historical biographies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有学者提出,中国古代史传在坚持实录原则的同时,允许虚构、想象,这种"虚构"包括对具体历史细节的虚构、想象和对一些神怪梦境、传说、传闻的记载。这一见解具有相当危害性。秉笔直书、实录不隐,始终是中国古代史传遵循的原则。史家不允许对历史细节,进行所谓的合情合理、设身处地的想象和虚构。史传中记录的一些神怪梦境、历史传闻等,是当时社会上已经流传、史家信以为真而加以记录的史事资料,它们并不属于史家本身之"想象"或"虚构"。主张史传可以虚构,甚至将史传的"文学性"等同于虚构和想象,都将取消史传的本质特性,为篡改和捏造历史打开方便之门。 Some modern scholars claim that Chinese ancient historical biographies uphold the principle of factual record while allowing fiction and imagination.The "fiction" includes fabricating and imagining on the historical details and accounting of gods and spirits,dreams,legend and hearsay,etc.This view is harmful.Writing without hiding is always the principle of Chinese ancient historical biographies.Historians do not allow imagination and fabrication of historical details.Those gods and spirits,dreams,legend and hearsay recorded by historical biographies are historical materials which has spread extensively and accepted as true.They do not belong to historian's fiction or imagination.If we advocate fictional historical biographies,even equate the literary features of historical biographies to fiction and imagination,it would eliminate the natural characteristic of historical biographies and open the door to distorting and concocting history.
作者 王轶
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期183-189,共7页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
关键词 史传 实录 “虚构”辨析 史传的“文学性” historical biographies factual record "fiction" discrimination literary feature of historical biographies
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1亚里土多德.诗学[M].罗念生,译.北京:人民文学出版杜,1984:28-29.
  • 2金圣叹.金圣叹全集(一)[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1985.
  • 3Roland Barthes.The Discourse of History[M].translated by Stephen Bann.Comparative Criticism.3(1981):7-20.
  • 4Robert Scholes.Elements of Fiction[M].NeW York:Oxford University Press.1968:6.
  • 5陆淳.春秋集传纂例[M].北京:商务印书馆,1936:2.
  • 6顾颉刚.春秋三传及国语之综合研究[M] //刘起舒笔记.成都:巴蜀书社,1988:38.
  • 7赵逵夫.论先秦时代的讲史、故事和小说[J].文史哲,2006(1):53-58. 被引量:15
  • 8顾颉刚.崔东壁遗书序[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:7.
  • 9班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,2005:1652
  • 10黄晖.论衡校释[M].北京:中华书局,1990..

二级参考文献13

  • 1王先谦.苟子集解[M].北京:中华书局,1988..
  • 2.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 3程树德.论语集释[M].北京:中华书局,1990..
  • 4徐元诰.国语集解[M].北京:中华书局,2002..
  • 5.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974..
  • 6阮元.十三经注疏·春秋公羊传注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980..
  • 7.孔丛子 四库全书本[M].,..
  • 8阮元.十三经注疏·仪礼注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980..
  • 9.逸周书 四库全书本[M].,..
  • 10阮元.十三经注疏·尚书正义[M].北京:中华书局,1980..

共引文献969

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部