期刊文献+

法院、检察院和公安机关的宪法关系 被引量:160

Constitutional Relationship between the People's Courts,the People's Procuratorates and the Public Security Organs
原文传递
导出
摘要 现行宪法第135条的规定涉及人民法院、人民检察院和公安机关之间的权限界定问题,其实际运作状况对三机关的职权和职能产生了重要影响。在1979年刑事诉讼法和1982年宪法颁布以前,三机关事实上形成了以公安机关为优先的分工、配合与制约关系,并共同接受政法主管部门的领导。在理解宪法规定的"分工负责,互相配合,互相制约"原则时应当强调,该原则是一个完整的逻辑和规范体系。"分工负责"体现的是它们的宪法地位,"互相配合"体现的是工作程序上的衔接关系,"互相制约"是三机关相互关系的核心价值要求。这一原则体现了两种服从关系:在价值理念上,效率服从于公平、配合服从于制约;在工作程序上,侦查服从于起诉、起诉服从于审判。现实中的三机关关系,应当根据宪法和立宪主义的价值理念合理调整。 The actual operation of article 135 of the current Constitution of the People's Republic of China, which defines the authority among the people's courts, the people's procuratorates and the public security organs, has a substantial impact on the power and functions of these three or- gans. Before the promulgation of the Criminal Procedure Law (1979) and the Constitution (1982), the three organs had formed a relationship of functional division, mutual cooperation and mutual constraint. In this relationship, the public security organs had a prior status, and the three organs should accept the leadership of the political--legal department in charge. The constitutional principle of "dividing their functions, each taking responsibility for its own work, coordinating their efforts and checking each other" should be emphasized as a complete sys- tem of logic and norms. "To divide their functions, each taking responsibility for its own work" reflects their independent constitutional status and their limited power. "To .coordinate their ef- forts" shows their convergence in the judicial procedures. "To check each other" is required by the core value of the relationship between the three organs and shows two kinds of subordinate rela- tionship. In terms of the value of the concept, efficiency is subject to fair, and cooperation is sub- ject to constraints. On the other hand, as for the judicial procedures, investigation is subject to prosecution, while prosecution is subject to trial. This constitutional principle is based on the cor- rect recognition of different state power, reflects the attribute of trial power, procuratorial power and investigative power, and ensures the mutual independence of these three kinds of power. The real relationship between the three organs should be adjusted according to constitutional provi- sions and values.
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期3-26,共24页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目“建设公正高效权威的社会主义司法制度研究”(批准号:07&ZD033)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 宪法原则 司法权力配置 司法改革 constitutional principle, division of judicial power, judicial reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1黄朝义.《检察关系》[J].月旦法学教室,2003,(8).
  • 2崔敏.“论司法权力的合理配置—兼谈检察制度改革的构想”,信春鹰,李林主编.《依法治国与司法改革》,中国法制出版社,1999年版,页368—382.
  • 3陈岚.我国检警关系的反思与重构[J].中国法学,2009(6):110-117. 被引量:42
  • 4李念祖.《打破“司法一元主义”的概念孤寂》[J].司改杂志,2001,(31).
  • 5《人民法院、人民检察署、人民监察委员会的分工和关系问题》,《人民日报》1951年3月30日.
  • 6《政府各部门向中央请示报告座谈会》(1953年2月19日),载姜华宣,张蔚萍,肖生生编.《中国共产党重要会议纪事(1921--2006)》增补本,中央文献出版社2006年版,第218页.
  • 7党的十六大报告(2002年11月8日).
  • 8董必武.《进一步加强人民民主法制,保障社会主义建设事业--在中国共产党第八次全国代表大会上的发言》(1956年9月19日),载中共中央文献研究室编.《建国以来重要文献选编》第9册,中央文献出版社1994年版,第270页.
  • 9王松苗,王丽丽.《六问六答:检察史上的名人名事》,《检察日报》2009年7月13日.
  • 10陈兴良.诉讼结构的重塑与司法体制的改革[J].人民检察,1999,0(1):48-50. 被引量:93

二级参考文献160

共引文献1152

同被引文献2205

引证文献160

二级引证文献1151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部