期刊文献+

国际关系的退化机制分析:一种解释框架

An Analysis of the Regression Mechanism of IR:An Interpretation Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文采用理性主义方法研究一个建构主义问题,关注国际关系中广泛存在的退化现象。在借鉴一些间接研究成果基础上,揉合理性主义和建构主义两种认识论,跨越结构和过程、体系和单元两个层次,提出一个链条式的国际关系退化机制分析框架。这个链条包括身份吻合度、有效支持度和时间维度三个环节,由于行为体的新旧身份不可能完全吻合,有效支持度是决定进化和退化的关键。支持从根本上说是政治参与问题,退化的症结在于大量行为体游离于体系之外,或者体系内行为体没有采取支持行为。 The paper attempts to employ a rationalist method to study an constructivist issue,focusing on the widespread phenomenon of regression in IR.By referring to some indirect research findings and integrating rationalism and constructivism,the paper proposes a chain analytical framework of the progression/regression mechanism in international relations,covering researches of both structure and process,and system and unit.Three links are included in the chain,namely,congruence degree between identities,effective support degree among actors,and temporal dimension of structural evolution.Since it is impossible to have the actor's old and new identities to be completely identical,the effectiveness of support functions as the critical factor that determines progression or regression of international relations.The paper holds that support is in essence a matter of political participation.The crux of regression in IR lies either in alienation of a large number of actors from the system,or in the possibility that at a crucial time actors within the system do not behave supportively.
作者 赵广成
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期42-49,共8页 Teaching and Research
关键词 身份吻合度 有效支持度 合作/冲突观 退化机制分析 congruence degree between identities effective support degree among actors the cooperation/conflict concept analysis of the Regress mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Dina A. Zinnes. Conflict Processes and the Breakdown of International Systems [M]. Denver:University of Denver (Colorado Seminary) ,1983.
  • 2赵广成.国际关系的退化机制分析:一项研究议程[J].世界经济与政治,2011(1):99-121. 被引量:8
  • 3Joseph Grieco. Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade [ M ]. Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1990.
  • 4Alexander Wendt. Social Theory of International Politics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 5亚历山大·温特.国际政治的社会理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000..
  • 6Barry Buzaru From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 7Hedley Bull. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.
  • 8李少军.怎样认识国际体系?[J].世界经济与政治,2009(6):13-20. 被引量:14
  • 9秦亚青.关系本位与过程建构:将中国理念植入国际关系理论[J].中国社会科学,2009(3):69-86. 被引量:218
  • 10Kenneth N. Waltz. Theory of International Politics[M]. Reading.. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. , 1979.

二级参考文献106

  • 1龚界文,胡静.“反向社会化”与“文化反哺”现象研究述要[J].青年探索,2004(5):20-23. 被引量:25
  • 2秦亚青.建构主义:思想渊源、理论流派与学术理念[J].国际政治研究,2006,27(3):1-23. 被引量:91
  • 3秦亚青,魏玲.结构、进程与权力的社会化——中国与东亚地区合作[J].世界经济与政治,2007(3):7-15. 被引量:83
  • 4黄光国.《人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏》[A].黄光国编.《中国人的权力游戏》[C].台北:巨流图书公司,1988年版..
  • 5Kenneth Boulding, Three Faces of Power, Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1990.
  • 6亚历山大·温特.《国际政治的社会理论》.第7章.
  • 7Mustafa Emirbayer, " Manifesto for a Relational Sociology, " American Journal of Sociology, vol.103, no. 2, 1997, pp. 281-317.
  • 8Patrick Thaddeus Jackson and Daniel H. Nexon, "Relations before States; Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics, " pp. 291-332.
  • 9Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, "Relational Constructivism; A War of Words, " in Jennifer Sterling-Folker, ed., Making Sense of International Relations Theory, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner, 2006, pp. 139-155.
  • 10Steve Smith, "New Approaches to International Theory, " in John Baylis and Steve Smith, eds.,The Globalization of World Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 186.

共引文献350

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部