期刊文献+

大都市辖区合并的经济增长绩效——基于上海市黄浦区与南市区的合并案例研究 被引量:11

The Economic Growth Performance of Jurisdiction Consolidation in Metropolis——A Case Study of the Consolidation of Huangpu and Nanshi district in Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 辖区合并能否带来更快的经济增长?本文基于2000年上海市黄浦区与南市区合并的案例,运用双重差分法,对辖区合并的经济增长绩效进行了评估,发现该项合并有效地推动了经济增长。本文认为,随着我国城市化发展进程的快速推进,在经济集聚的内在动力下,推动经济增长的机制将由以往严重依赖于地方政府之间的竞争效应到依靠规模经济效应与竞争效应并重的转变,有选择地进行辖区合并是顺应这种趋势的一种可行方案。 Can jurisdiction consolidation promote economic growth performance? Based on the review of literatures on economic growth effects of jurisdiction consolidation, the consolidation of Huangpu and Nanshi district in Shanghai in 2000 is selected as a case. By employing the method of DID (difference in difference), its impact on economic growth is assessed and then a considerable effect is found out. With the speeding process of urbanization and the inner motive of economic agglomeration in China, there may be a transformation of economic growth mechanism from heavily depending on the competition effect between local governments to scale effect be equal to competition effect, jurisdiction consolidation is a practicable program to accommodate this transformation.
作者 高琳
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期38-45,共8页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 上海市2010年度曙光学者跟踪项目"城市体系的空间和规模结构合理化研究" 上海市重点建设学科资助项目(B101)
关键词 辖区合并 经济增长 规模经济 经济集聚 jurisdiction consolidation economic growth economies of scale economic agglomeration
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Boyne, G. A. Local Government Structure and Performance : Lessons From America? [ J ]. Public Administration, 1992,70, ( 3 ) : 333 - 357.
  • 2Feiock. R. C. The Political Economy of Growth Management[ J ]. American Politics Research, 1994, 22, (2) :208 -220.
  • 3Fox, W. F. , and T. , Gurley. Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments[ C]. Policy Research Working Paper,World Bank, No. 3913. 2006.
  • 4Hawkins, B. W. , Ward, K. J. , and M. P. , Becker. Governmental Consolidation As a Strategy for Metropolitan Develop- ment[ J ]. Public Administration Quarterly, 1991, 15, (2) : 253 - 267.
  • 5Hendrick, R. , Jimenez, B., and K., Lal. Does Local Government Fragmentation Cost Less? [ R]. Association of Budgeting and Financial Management, 20^th Annual Conference, Oct. 22 - 25, 2005.
  • 6Keating, M. Size, Efficiency, and Democracy: Consolidation, Fragmentation, and Public Choice [ C ]. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman, Theories of Urban Politics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,1995.
  • 7Lowery, D. A Transactions Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation Versus Redistribution in Urban America [ J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2000,10, (1) : 49 -78.
  • 8McDavid, J. C. The Impacts of Amalgamation on Police Services in the Halifax Regional Municipality [ J ]. Canadian Public Administration, 2002, 45, (4) :538 - 565.
  • 9Nelson, A. and K. Foster. Metropolitan Governance Structure and Income Growth [ J ]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1999, (21) : 309 - 324.
  • 10Oakerson, R. Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis [ M ]. Oakland, California: Institute of Contemporary Studies Press, 1999.

二级参考文献55

共引文献5818

同被引文献191

引证文献11

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部