期刊文献+

英语课程中“发展性学生学业评价”的研究模式——基于建构主义的视角 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国基础教育改革进一步深化,学生学业评价成为越来越关注的焦点。学生学业评价按照其功能通常可分为三类:水平性评价、选拔性评价和发展性评价。水平性评价是指,在了解教育目标的基础上,明确师生的教学、学习水平与预期之间的差距,旨在实现评价的鉴定功能。
出处 《中小学英语教学与研究》 北大核心 2011年第5期52-56,共5页 English Teaching & Research Notes
基金 本文系2010年上海市教委科研创新项目(B~5400-11-010)的研究成果.
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Bachman, L. ( 1990 ) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Bachman, L. (2002) Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453-476.
  • 3Breen, M. P. (1991) Understanding the language teacher. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith and M. Swan (Eds.). Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research. ( pp. 213 - 233). Clevedon: Muhilinguial Matters.
  • 4Gollnick, B. ( 1997 ) Is performance assessment for real? NCATE Reporter, 5( 1 ). 4.
  • 5Gysen, S. & Avermaet, P.V. (2005) Issues in functional language performance assessment: Case of the certificate Dutch as a Foreign language. Language As- sessment Quarterly, 2( 1 ): 51 -68.
  • 6Herman, J. L. , Aschbacher P. C. , & Winters, L. ( 1992 ) A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • 7Hughes, B. (2005) Using performance assessments in traditional physics classes. Retrieved on June. 2009 at : http ://www. nefstem. org/project/final_reports/ Hughes. pdf.
  • 8Krashen, S. ( 1981 ) The fundamental pedagogical principle in second language teaching. Studia Linguisitica, 35, 50 - 70.
  • 9Kumar, A., White, L & Helgeson, S. L. (1993) Effect of hypercard and traditional performance assessment methods on expert-novice chemistry problem solving. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Atlanta, GA, April 15 -19, 1993 ). Eric digest No. ED362389.
  • 10Larsen-Freeman,D. & Long,M. H. (1991) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London ; New York : Longman.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Peter W. Airasian(1997): Classroom Assesmaent,New York, The McGtaw-Hill Companies.
  • 2S.B. Kakkar: Evaluating Students: A Difficult Job,Current Issues In Education: Vikas Publishing House PVTTLID, (2000)pp. 80-87.
  • 3S.B. Kakkar: Pupil Behaviour: Is Teacher The Best Judge, Current Issues In Education; Vikas Publishing House PVTLTD, (2000)pp. 325-332.
  • 4[美]RobenLLinn&NormanE Gronlund著.国家基础教育课程改革、“促进教师发展与学生成长的评价研究”项目组译,教学中的测验与评价[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003..

共引文献35

同被引文献49

  • 1贾军红.形成性评价的研究现状与发展趋势——以中国学术期刊网络出版总库为样本来源[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2012,27(1):106-109. 被引量:52
  • 2毛新耀,吴丽.试论新课程中学生发展性评价[J].山西教育(管理版),2004(17):35-36. 被引量:3
  • 3姚莲彩.实施发展性评价 促进学生健康成长[J].河南教育(基教版)(上),2004(12):11-11. 被引量:2
  • 4钟启泉.《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》解读[M].上海,华东师范大学出版社,2002.
  • 5谢先庆 徐涛.“新课程课堂教学发展性评价研究”[J].中国教育导刊,2004,(8).
  • 6Bachman, L. Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment [J]. Language Testing, 2002, 19: 453-476.
  • 7Breen, M. P. Understanding the language teacher [A]. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith & M. Swan. (eds.) Foreign:Second Language Pedagogy Research [C]. Clevedon: Multilinguial Matters, 1991: 213-233.
  • 8Calderhead, J. Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge [A]. In D.C. Berliner & R.C.Calfee. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology [C]. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1996:709- 725.
  • 9Ellis, R. SLA Research and Language Teaching [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • 10Gollnick, D. ls performance assessment for real? [J]. NCATEReporter, 1997, 5(1): 4.

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部