期刊文献+

心理内容的外在主义解释及其困境

Externalist Explanation of Mental Content and its Dilemmas
原文传递
导出
摘要 外在主义者认为心理内容本质上是一种关系属性,它依赖于意向心理状态持有者所处的环境。在当代,普特南以"孪生地球"思想试验表达了"意义不在头脑之中"的外在主义理念,而柏奇的社会外在主义则更加深入地分析了心理内容或意义中所渗透的社会因素。然而,面对因果相关性、自知以及空概念的难题,外在主义者却难以给出令人满意的回应。 The externalists think that mental content in nature is a kind of relational property,it depends on the circumstance where the holders of intentional mental states live.At present,H.Putnam illustrates that meaning does not exist in the brain by the thought experiment of Twin Earth,and T.Burge insists on social externalism and analyses the social elements included in mental content or meaning.But the externalists could not respond to the dilemmas of cause and effect interrelationship,self-knowledge and no-being satisfactorily.
作者 郭琰
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期19-23,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 心理内容 外在主义 因果相关性 自知 空概念 mental content externalism cause and effect interrelationship self-knowledge no-being
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1普特南,李绍猛,译.“意义”的意义[A].陈波/韩林合.逻辑与语言[M].北京:东方出版,2005.
  • 2H.普特南,高新民.计算心理学与解释理论[J].世界哲学,1993(2):24-32. 被引量:1
  • 3H Putnam. Representation and Reality[ M]. The MIT Press, 1987.
  • 4T Burge. "Where in is Language Social?" C A Anderson, et al(ed. ). Propositional Attitudes [M]. Stanford University, CSLI, 1990.
  • 5T Burge. "Individualism and the Mental"[A]//D Rosenthal (ed.), The Nature of Mind[M]. Oxford University. Press, 1991.
  • 6T Burge. "Individualism and Psychology"[A]//C Macdon- ald and G Macdonald (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology [M]. Blackwell, 1995.
  • 7J Kim. Philosophy of Mind [M]. Westview Press, 1996.
  • 8G Segal. A Slim Book about Narrow Content[M]. The MIT Press, 2000.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部