国际安全、国际政治经济与科学技术被引量：5

International security,international political economy and S&T

导出

摘要近年来,国际关系开始加强对科学与技术这一议题的关注。以往的文献主要有两条研究路径:国际安全领域的文献主要关注科学技术的变迁如何影响了国际关系;而国际政治经济学的研究主要关注国际关系的变化如何影响了科学技术。国际政治经济学的研究路径试图涉足多个学科聚焦的难题,使得国际关系能够占据新的研究领地。对这一议题的研究,国际政治经济学与国际安全、比较政治经济学以及美国政治经济学出现了交叉和合流。这些努力为未来的研究提供了新的机遇,也为跨学科的合作提供了新的前景。 In recent years,more and more scholars in International Relations pay attention to the issue of science and technology.The existing literatures have two approaches in studying of this.The first approach is from international security,it takes science and technology as independent variable and international politics as dependent variable;the second approach is from international political economy,it takes international political factors as independent variable and scientific and technological factors as dependent variable.The second approach is trying to occupy the commanding heights for international relations.In addition,International Political Economy,International Security,Comparative Political Economy and American Political Economy have more and more interactions and convergence in this issue,which provides more opportunities for the future research.

作者黄琪轩

机构地区上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期650-657,共8页 Studies in Science of Science

基金上海市晨光计划(10CG14)

关键词国际安全国际政治经济学科学与技术 international security international political economy science and technology

分类号 N05 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献32

1Breznitz D. National institutions and the globalized po- litical economy of technological change: an introduction [J]. Review of Policy Research, 2009, (26) : 1 - 11.
2Shavinina L. The International Handbook on Innovation [ C]. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 2003.
3Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R. The Oxford Hand- book of Innovation [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
4Hackett E, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies[ M]. London: The MIT Press, 2008.
5Pearton M. The Knowledgeable State: Diplomacy, War, and Technology since 1830 [ M ]. London: Burnett Books, 1982.
6罗伯特·吉尔平.世界政治中的战争与变革[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
7Waltz K. Theory of International Politics [ M ]. MA: Addison - Wesley, 1979. 181, 178 - 181.
8Cohen B. The multiple traditions of American IPE[ A]. Mark Blyth. Routledge Handbook of International Politi- cal Economy [ C ]. London and New York: Routledge, 2009. 23 - 35.
9Herrera G. Technology and International Transforma- tion: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change[ M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.
10Jervis R. Cooperation under the security dilemma[ J]. World Polities, 1978, (30) : 198.

二级参考文献19

1Aron, Raymond, 1966. Peace and War. New York: Doubleday and Company.
2Badwin, D., 1985. Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3Bull, Hedley, 1977. The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.
4Buzan, Barry, 2004. United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.
5Chan, Steve, 2004. “Exporing Puzzles in Power-Transition Theory: Implications for Sino-American.” Security Studies. 13: 3.
6Copeland, Dale C., 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
7Gilpin, Robert, 1970. "Technological Strategies and National Purpose." Science. 169(3944): 441-8.
8Gilpin, Robert, 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9Herrera, Geoffrey L., 2006. Technology and International Transformation: the Railroad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change. Albany: State University of New York Press.
10Hopf, Ted, 1991. "Polarity, the Offense Defense Balance, and War." The American Politicol Science Review. 85(2): 490.