期刊文献+

风险投资、研发投入与区域创新——基于商标的省级面板研究 被引量:63

Venture capital,R&D and regional innovation——based on provincial panel of trademark
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于省级面板数据构建了中国省域的创新投入产出经验模型,该模型首次把商标数量作为创新的度量指标,实证分析了我国27个省市的风险投资、研发等因素对区域创新产出的影响。实证结果表明,无论是只考虑风险投资和研发投入的简单模型,还是在控制了研发投入、经济发展水平、工资水平、开放度、教育水平变量后的扩展模型,我国的风险投资对创新均具有明显的促进作用。研究还发现,我国的研发投入对创新产出具有正向促进作用,并且研发投入对区域创新能力的促进作用要明显高于风险投资。同时,风险投资与商标之间并不存在明显的滞后效应。经济发展水平和教育水平也会有利于区域创新,但并未发现国内各地区工资水平和开放程度对区域创新能力的显著影响。 This paper constructed provincial experience in the domain of innovation input-output model using panel data methods,trademark is an indicator of innovation that we introduce trademark into the model in the first time,analysis the impact of regional innovation output and cities about venture capital,research and development,economic development level,wage levels,educational level and openness of China's 27 provinces.The empirical results show that venture capital for innovation all have a clear promoting role not only simple model just to consider RD and venture capital but also the model in the control of the research and development,economic development level,wage levels,the degree of openness,level of education.And we also found that,RD on innovation output has a positive role in promoting,this research have been found to be consistent,on the regional innovation systems,RD developed the capacity to be significantly higher than the promotion of the role of venture capital.Meanwhile,venture capital and there is no lag between the trademarks.Regional economic development level and education level will be conducive to regional innovation,but we did not find regional wage level and openness of the regional innovation ability of visible evidence of positive impact.
作者 邵同尧 潘彦
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期793-800,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70903046)
关键词 风险投资 研发 区域创新 商标 venture capital R&D regional innovation trademark
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1马晓国,李宗植,管军.江苏风险投资与高新技术产业发展实证分析[J].科学学研究,2005,23(B12):152-156. 被引量:19
  • 2杨大楷,邵同尧.风险投资中的创新度量:指标、缺陷及最新进展[J].经济问题探索,2010(7):62-66. 被引量:7
  • 3Sandro Mendonca, Tiago Santos Pereira, Manuel Mira Godinho. Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change [ J ]. Research Policy, 2004, ( 33 ) : 1385 -1404.
  • 4Samuel Kortum, Josh Lerner. Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation[ J]. Rand Journal of Eco- nomics ,2000, (31) :674 - 692.
  • 5Ueda, Hirukawa. Venture capital and industrial "innova- tion" [ R ]. Working Paper, University of Wisconsin ,2008.
  • 6Gilbert R J, David M G. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly [ J ]. American Economic Re- view, 1982, (72) :514 - 526.
  • 7Zucker L G, Darby M R, Brewer M B. Intellectual hu- man capital and the birth of U. S. biotechnology enter- prises [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1998, ( 88 ) : 290 - 306.
  • 8Bhide A V. The Origins and Evolution of New Businesses [ M ]. New York :Oxford University Press,2000.
  • 9Tredennick, Nick. An engineer' s view of venture capital- ists [ EB/OL ]. IEEE spectrum online, www. spectrum. ieee. org/WEBONLY/resource/sep01/spek. html,2001.
  • 10万坤扬,袁利金.创业投资与技术创新关系的实证分析[J].工业工程与管理,2006,11(1):72-76. 被引量:28

二级参考文献59

  • 1Acs, Z.J. , Audretsch, D.B. & M. P. Feldman (1994), "R&D spiUovers and the recipient firm size", the review of economies and statistics 76: 336 - 340.
  • 2Arundel, A. & Kabla, I. (1998), "What percentage of innovations arepatented? Empirical estimates for European firms", Research Policy 27 : 127 - 141.
  • 3Chemmanur, T., K. Krishnan & D. Nandy (2008), "How does Venture Capital Financing Improve Effieieney in Private Finns? A Look Beneath the Surface", Working Paper, Boston College.
  • 4Coombs, R., Narandren, P. & Richards, A.(1996), "A literature- based innovation output indicator", Research Policy 25 : 403 -413.
  • 5Chudnovsky, Lopez &Pupato (2006), "Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms" behavior ( 1992 -2001 ) " Research Policy 35 : 266 - 288.
  • 6Griliches, Z. (1990), "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A survey", Journal of economic literature 28 : 1661 - 1707.
  • 7Gilbert, Richard J. & David M. G Newbery (1982), "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly", American Economic Review 72 : 514 -526.
  • 8Hall, Bronwyn H. & Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis (2001), "The patent paradox revisited: all empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979 - 1995", RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1) : 101 - 128.
  • 9Horstmann I., Macdonald & A. Slivinski (1985), "Patents as Information Transfer Mechanism: To Patent or (Maybe) Not to Patent", Journal of Political Economy 837 - 858.
  • 10Jacobsson, S. , C. Oskarsson & J · Philipson ( 1996), "Indicators of technological activities - comparing educational, patent and R&D statistics in the case of Sweden", Research Policy 25.

共引文献98

同被引文献943

引证文献63

二级引证文献585

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部