期刊文献+

评价中心公文筐测验结构效度的实证研究 被引量:4

An Empirical Study of Construct Validity of In-Basket Test of Assessment Center
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过编制公文筐测验,以大学毕业生为被试,探讨公文筐测试的信度和结构效度。结果显示,所设计公文筐测试具有较高的信度(0.912),各测评维度之间的相关系数为0.563-0.856,各评价维度与总分之间的相关为0.795-0.955;且各测评维度能独立测量相关特质。以4个测评维度构建结构方程模型,其各项拟合指标均达到理想水平,结构效度较好,能有效地区分所测评的各维度。研究结果表明设计良好的公文筐测试可有效地应用于测评,为人员选拔与测评提供科学客观的依据。 By compiling an In-Basket Test,with university graduates as the subjects,the study has explored the reliability and construct validity of In-Basket Test.The results illustrate that the designed In-Basket Test has high reliability(0.912),with the correlation coefficient between dimensions is 0.563-0.856,while the correlation coefficient between each dimension and total score is 0.795-0.955;Furthermore,each dimension can independently measure associated factors.Construct a structural equation model of 4 evaluation dimensions,each fit index of the model has reached the desired level and good construct validity.The model can effectively distinguish evaluated various dimensions.The results show that well-designed In-Basket Test can be effectively applied in evaluation,and it can provide scientific and objective basis for personnel selection and evaluation.
机构地区 广州大学
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期71-74,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划2010年课题"评价中心技术的应用性研究"(GD10CGL08)
关键词 评价中心 公文筐测试 结构效度 人员测评 assessment center In-Basket Test Construct Validity personnel evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Brannick MT,Michaels CE,Baker DP.Construct validity of in-basket scores[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1989(74):957-963.
  • 2Hakstian A.P.,Scratchley L.S.In-basket Assessment by Fully Objective Methods:Development and Evaluation of a Self-report System[J].Education and Psychological Measurement,1997(57):607-630.
  • 3Richard C.Joines.The General Management In-Basket (GMIB)Technical Report.Management & Personnel Systems,Inc,2007.
  • 4Jansen,Paul G.W.;Stoop,Bert A.M.The dynamics of assessment center validity:Results of a 7-Year Study[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001(86):741-753.
  • 5Sackett Paul R.,Tuzinski Kathleen A.The Role of Dimensions and Exercises in Assessment Center Judgments[N].London,Manuel(Ed).How People Evaluate Others in Organizations.Applied in Psychology,2001:111-129.
  • 6Mark C.B,David J.W.A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of the Impact of Dimension and Exercise Factors on Assessment Center Ratings[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2006(91):1114-1124.
  • 7June Hahn,Peter Bycio,Kenneth M.Alvares.Situational Specificity in Assessment Center Ratings:A Confirmstory Factor Analysis[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1987(72):463-474.
  • 8Lievens F.,Conway J M.Dimension and Exercise Variance in Assessment Center Scores:A Large-scale Evaluation of Multitrait-multimethod Studies[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001(86):1202-1222.
  • 9Bernd Marcus,R.D.Goflin,N.G.Johnston,et al.Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of typical and maximum managerial performance[J].Human Performance,2007(20):275-285.
  • 10Bowler M.C.,Woehr D.J.Assessment Center Construct -related Validity Stepping Beyond the MTMM Matrix[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,2009(75):173-182.

二级参考文献55

  • 1吴志明,张厚粲.评价中心的构想效度和结构模型[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):372-378. 被引量:37
  • 2[1]Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations, 1989. 1~2
  • 3[2]Russell C J. Individual Decision Processes in an Assessment Center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70:737~746
  • 4[3]Gaugler B B, Thornton Ⅲ G C. Number of Assessment Center Dimensions as a Determinant of Assessor Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74:611~618
  • 5[5]Jansen P, Jongh F D. Assessment Centers: A Practical Handbook. JOHN WILEY & SONS, 1997.25~26
  • 6[6]Ryan A M, Daurn D B, Todd G. Direct, Indirect, and Controlled Observation and Rating Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology,1995, 80:664~670
  • 7[7]Lievens F. Assessor Training Strategies and Their Effects on Accuracy, Interrater Reliability, and Discriminant Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86:255~264
  • 8[8]Schleicher D J, Day D V. A New Frame for Frame-Of-Reference Training: Enhancing the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87:735~746
  • 9[9]Murphy K R. Criterion Issues in Performance Appraisal Research: Behavioral Accuracy Versus Classification Accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50:45~50
  • 10[10]Thornton Ⅲ G C, Zorich S. Training to Improve Observer Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65:351~354

共引文献47

同被引文献13

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部