期刊文献+

不同胎龄早产儿1岁时体格和神经发育差异分析 被引量:23

Comparison of differences of physique and neurodevelopment in early preterm infants and late preterm infants at 1 year of age
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同胎龄早产儿1岁时体格发育和神经发育的差异。方法随访年龄达到1岁的早产儿,分为早期早产儿(EPI)组(胎龄<34周)和晚期早产儿(LPI)组(34周≤胎龄<37周),比较两组体重和身长发育的差异、体重和身长增长迟缓发生率,以及运动发育指数(PDI)、智力发育指数(MDI)和精神运动发育的差异。结果 EPI组68例,LPI组106例。1岁时两组体重差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),EPI组身长低于LPI组[(74.1±2.2)cm比(75.9±2.9)cm,P<0.05)],身长增长迟缓发生率高于LPI组(26.5%比7.4%,P<0.05)。校正年龄6个月和1岁时两组MDI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),EPI组PDI低于LPI组[(77.7±9.4)分比(86.6±11.4)分,(81.0±12.1)分比(88.2±11.5)分,P均<0.05)]。脑性瘫痪EPI组2例,LPI组3例。结论 1岁时EPI身长和运动发育较LPI明显延迟,应重视不同胎龄早产儿的出院后干预。 Objective The study aims to compare physical development and neurodevelopment between early preterm infants (EPI) and late preterm infants (LPI) at 1 year of age. Methods Preterm infants are grouped into EPI and LPI with following up for one year. Differences in their body weight, body length, rate of growth retardation ( ≤ P10), psychomotor development index (PDI), mental development index (MDI) and neurophysical development are compared. Results Totally 68 cases of EPI and 106 cases of LPI were studied. The body length of EPI are shorter than the LPI (P 〈 0.05) in body length and The incidence of developmental retardation in body length were higher in the EPI group than that in LPI group (P 〈 0.05 ) at 1 year of age, but no significant difference for weight (P 〉 0. 05 ) There was no difference in MDI between the two groups at 6 months and 1 year of age (P 〉 0. 05) , but PDI of EPI are lower than that of LPI (P 〈 0. 05). We found 2 cases cerebral palsy in EPI group and 3 cases in EPI group. Conclusions Our data suggest that the length and physical development of EPI are significantly delayed compared with LPI at 1 year age, therefore priorities should be given to the early intervention of various preterm infants upon discharge.
出处 《中国新生儿科杂志》 CAS 2011年第3期177-180,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neonatology
关键词 早期早产儿 晚期早产儿 发育 随访 Early preterm infants Late preterm infants Development Follow up
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张欣,王颖,冯琪,郭在晨.极低出生体重儿住院期间营养及临床状况分析[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2010,25(5):268-271. 被引量:17
  • 2孙秀静,余欣庭,王丹华,全国早产儿营养调查协作组.以年龄别体重z评分方法评价早产儿住院期间生长情况的临床研究[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2010,25(5):263-267. 被引量:19
  • 3茹喜芳,冯琪,王颖,张欣,李星,蒙景雯,郭在晨.早产儿体重增长的动态评估及其意义[J].中华儿科杂志,2010,48(9):661-667. 被引量:29
  • 4金汉珍,黄德珉,官希吉.实用新生儿学第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:429-433.
  • 5胡亚美,江载芳,诸福棠.实用儿科学.第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:1962-1963.
  • 6Itabash K,Mishina J,Tada H,et al.Longitudinal follow-up of height up to five years of age in infants born preterm small for gestational age;comparison to full-term small for gestational age infants.Early Hum Dev,2007,83:327-333.
  • 7Niklasson A,Engstrom E,Hard AL,et al.Growth in very preterm children:a longitudinal study.Pediatr Res,2003,54:899-905.
  • 8Setia s,Sridhar MG.Changes in GH/ICF-1 axis in intrauterine growth retardation:consequences of fetal programming?Horm Metab Res,2009,41:791-798.
  • 9王丹华.早产儿喂养的新理念[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2010,25(5):257-259. 被引量:36
  • 10Wu YW.Escobar GJ,Grether JK,et al.Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy in team and near-term infants.JAMA,2003,290:2677-2684.

二级参考文献43

共引文献233

同被引文献211

引证文献23

二级引证文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部