期刊文献+

大学生课内外科研选题活动的对比分析 被引量:1

A Comparative Analysis of University Students’ Outside- and Inside-class Subject-finding for Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过考察大学生在课内与课外这两类典型科研活动中的选题表现显示,选题均需要积极的思维活动、有效的思维策略、知识基础与时间酝酿,但两者在选题意识、选题范围、选题过程、选题思维、选题策略和选题结果等方面存在明显差异。基于两类选题之间的优势互补,本研究提出了促进大学生科研选题活动的相关策略。 The comparative analysis of university students’ outside-and inside-class research subject-finding indicates that both require active thinking,effective strategy,fundamental knowledge and contemplating time,but significant differences exist in consciousness,domain,process,thinking,approach,result,etc..This research,based on their complementariy of advantages,provides certain specific measures to improve the quality of subject finding.
作者 陈丽君
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2011年第3期114-118,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 科研活动 选题方式 大学生 思维特点 scientific research subject finding university student modes of thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

  • 1李鹏斌.《学位与研究生教育》论文作者群及论文选题分布的统计与分析[J].学位与研究生教育,1997(4):72-75. 被引量:6
  • 2Mauzy J, Harriman R. A. Three Climates for Creativity.Research Technology Management, 2003, 46(3):27-30.
  • 3Naglieri J. A. Kaufman J. C. Understanding intelligence,giftedness and creativity using the PASS theory. Roeper Review, 2001, 23 (3): 151-156.
  • 41i-Fang Zhang. Thinking Styles and Modes of Thinking:Implications for Education and Research. The Journal of Psychology, 2002, 136(3): 245-261.
  • 5Subrata Dasgupta, Multidisciplinary creativity: the case of Herbert A. Simon, Cognitive Science, 2003, 27: 683-707.
  • 6Noppe, L.D. Progression in the service of the ego, cognitive styles, and creative thinking. Creativity research journal,1996, 9(4): 369-383.
  • 7Messick S. The matter of style: manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational psychologist, 1994, 29: 121-136.
  • 8LeBoutillier N, Marks D. F. Mental imagery and creativity:A meta-analytic review study. The British Journal of Psychology, 2003, v94 pti: 29-44.
  • 9Rothenberg, A. Creativity and madness: new findings and old stereotypes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
  • 10Lewis T, Petrina S. Hill, A. M. Problem posingadding a creative increment to technological problem solving.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1998, 36 (1): 5-35.

共引文献101

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部