1[1]Bidaut LM, Laurent C, Piotin M, et al. Second-generation three-dimensional reconstruction for rotational three-dimensional angiography. Acad Radiol,1998, 5:836-849.
2[2]Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Neurosurgery,2000, 47:866-871.
3[3]Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography-preliminary study. Radiology,1998, 209:95-102.
4[4]Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Neuroradiology,1999, 26:87-91.
5[5]Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology,1998, 208:447-451.
6[6]Jager HR, Moore EA, Bynevelt M, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of two different techniques with an unenhanced 2D time-of-flight sequence. Neuroradiology,2000, 42:240-248.
7[7]Missler U, Hundt C, Wiesmann M, et al. Three-dimensional reconstructed rotational digital subtraction angiography in planning treatment of intracranial aneurysm. Eur Radiol,2000, 10:564-568.
8[8]Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovacular treatment. Radiology,2001, 218:799-808.
