期刊文献+

腰麻、硬膜外麻醉及联合应用在剖宫产术中的效果比较 被引量:19

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腰麻、硬膜外麻醉及腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的麻醉效果。方法选取2007年2月至2009年2月150例择期行子宫下段剖宫产的足月妊娠孕妇,分为3组,分别应用腰麻、硬膜外麻醉及腰硬联合麻醉,观察麻醉诱导时间、麻醉阻滞效果、药物不良反应等。结果腰硬联合麻醉效果优于腰麻、硬膜外麻醉(P<0.01),腰麻麻醉效果优于硬膜外麻醉(P<0.01)。结论腰硬联合麻醉优于腰麻及硬膜外麻醉,用于剖宫产手术是安全可行的。
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2011年第9期1317-1318,共2页 Hebei Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Van de Velde M. Modem neuraxial labor analgesia:options for initiation, maintenance and drug selection. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2009,56 : 546-561.
  • 2Correa Chacon OC, Fabregat Lopez J. Obstetric epidural analgesia and fetal heart rate : primum non nocere. Minerva Anestesiol, 2010,76 : 314- 315.
  • 3Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med, 2010,362:1503-1510.
  • 4Lee JW, Kim D, Choi HH, et al. The change of T-wave on electroeardtiogram after epinephrine test dose in spinal anesthetized adults. Korean Journal Anesthesiol,2010 ,58 :351-356.
  • 5Tanqueray TA, Dob DP. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in a patient with cerebral palsy. Int J Obstet Anesth ,2010,19:238.
  • 6Tayal G, Mittal RK, Kalyal S. Combined spinal epidural causes a higher level of block than equivalent, single - shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth Analg,2007,104:745-746.

同被引文献97

  • 1郑水月.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉应用于横切口剖宫产的体会[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(4):64-65. 被引量:1
  • 2Thomas JM,Schug SA.Recent advances in the Pharmcokinetics of locac anaesthetics.Long-acting amide enantiomers and continuous in fusions.Clin Pharmacokinet,1999,36:67-83.
  • 3Alley EA,Kopacz DJ,MCDonald SB,et al.Hyperbaric spinal levobupiva-caine:acomparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers.Anesth Analg,2002,94:188-193.
  • 4黄海霞.罗哌卡因与布比卡因在剖宫产手术中麻醉效果的比较[J].中国健康月刊,2011,30:252-253.
  • 5陆卫升,张惠萍,和素芬,罗宗荣,吴佳璇,解智超.三种椎管内麻醉术在剖宫产中的对比观察[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2007,24(5):565-566. 被引量:11
  • 6Vande Velde M. Modern neuraxial labor analgesia: options for ini- tiation, maintenance and drug selection. Rev Esp Anestcsiol Re- anim, 2009, 56(9):546-561.
  • 7Catherine MD, Pierre blanie MD. Ropivacaine O. 1 plus sufen- tanil 0.5g/ml versus patient- controlled epidural analgesia for la- bor. Anesthesiology, 2000: 92..1588-1593.
  • 8Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride and car-bon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural an-algesia[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, 1965 , 16(1):55-69.
  • 9吴大胜,孙洪河.多种麻醉方法在剖宫产手术中的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(35):4974-4975. 被引量:17
  • 10Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-cesarean maternal pain:a randomized trial [ J 1. Int J Ob- stet Anesth,2007,16(2) :135-138.

引证文献19

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部