期刊文献+

3种根管封闭材料根管充填术后疼痛的临床观察 被引量:3

Comparative study of postoperative pain applying three canal sealers for root canal therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比观察3种根管封闭材料在根管充填术后近期发生疼痛的情况。方法临床上选取因牙髓炎或根尖周炎需行根管治疗的206例单根前牙,随机分为3组,分别采用AH Plus糊剂加牙胶尖(A组)、Cortisomol糊剂加牙胶尖(B组)、氧化锌丁香油糊剂加牙胶尖(C组)为根管充填材料进行根管充填,对于近期疼痛发生情况用VSA评价标尺记录并行检验分析比较。结果氧化锌丁香油糊剂组术后疼痛发生率要高于AH plus糊剂组和Cortisomol糊剂组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论以AH Plus糊剂及Cortisomol糊剂作为根管封闭材料可明显减少根管充填术后疼痛的发生。 Objective To compare the occurrence of postoperative pain after applying three canal sealers for root canal filling.Methods 206 single rooted anterior teeth scheduled for root canal therapy were included from outpatients,which were randomly divided into three groups.After root canal instrumentation using step-back technique,root canal filling was finished with AH Plus,cortisomol and zinc oxide eugenol as sealers respectively.The occurrence of postoperative pain was evaluated by VAS value ruler after root canal filling.Results The diffreence in pain among the three groups were statisticallly significant after root canal filling.The incidence of postoperative pain in zinc oxide eugenol group is higher significantly than the other two groups.Conclusion The root canal therapy using AH Plus and Cortisomol sealer can significantly reduce postoperative pain.
作者 魏莉 赵应楼
出处 《安徽医学》 2011年第4期482-483,共2页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 根管治疗 根管封闭材料 根管充填 术后疼痛 Root canal therapy Canal sealers Root canal filling Postoperative pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

  • 1徐爱凤,张琛,侯本祥.不同根管封闭剂根管充填术后疼痛的临床研究[J].北京口腔医学,2005,13(2):108-110. 被引量:32
  • 2沈丹琦.一次性药物根充的疗效观察[J].口腔医学,1996,16(2):97-98. 被引量:25
  • 3史俊南.牙髓治疗临床疗效评定[J].临床口腔医学杂志,1985,1(1):49-49.
  • 4Kenneth M,Michael M,Minstsai L,et al.Biological properties of Engenol and Zinc Oxide-eugenol.A clinically oriented review.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol,1992,73(6):729-737.
  • 5全勇泉.尖周炎伴窦道牙根管治疗术一次法的临床观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,1996,6(1):48-48.
  • 6Sousa C J, Montes CR, Pascon EA, et al. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany root canal sealers [ J ]. J Endod, 2006,32 ( 7 ) : 656 - 662.
  • 7Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H, Sengun A, et al. The quantitative evaluation of apical sealing of four endodontic sealers [J]. J Endod, 2006,32( 1 ) :66 -68.
  • 8Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Tay FR, et al. Initial in vitro biological response to contemporary endodontic sealers [ J ]. J Endod, 2006, 32(10) :989 -992.
  • 9张光诚,王嘉德.根管治疗期间的急症[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),1990,17(5):279-283. 被引量:75
  • 10资云玲,李梅,张颂农.碘仿氢氧化钙糊剂注射根管充填的微渗漏实验研究[J].口腔医学纵横,2000,16(1):47-49. 被引量:51

共引文献159

同被引文献29

  • 1李矛.AH Plus糊剂充填根管后的临床观察[J].中国实用医药,2007,2(18):61-62. 被引量:4
  • 2凌均柴.根尖周病治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:171-172.
  • 3樊明文.牙体牙髓病学[M].'北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.3.
  • 4Uroz-Torres D, Gonzdlez-Rodriguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments [ J ]. J Endod, 2009, 35(5): 699-702.
  • 5Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, et al. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(4): 228-230.
  • 6Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Use of nickel titanium rotary Path File to create the glide path~ comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(3): 408-412.
  • 7Pasqualini D, Mollo L, Scotti N, et al. Postoperative pain after manual and mechanical glide path: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(1): 32-36.
  • 8Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, et al. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni Ti files performed by students[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36(4): 246-255.
  • 9Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals [J]. Int Endod J, 2005, 38(2): 112-123.
  • 10SchMer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(6):432-435.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部