期刊文献+

The effect of pyrazine odor on avoidance learning and memory in wild robins Erithacus rubecula 被引量:1

The effect of pyrazine odor on avoidance learning and memory in wild robins Erithacus rubecula
原文传递
导出
摘要 Toxic insects advertise their defended state to potential predators using warning displays. Frequently these displays use cues through more than one sensory modality, and combine color, smell and sound to produce a multimodal warning display. Signalling through more than one sensory pathway may enhance the rate of avoidance learning, and the memorability of the learned avoidance. A common insect warning odor, pyrazine, has previously been shown to increase the rate of learned avoidance of unpalatable yellow prey by domestic chicks (GaUus gallus domesticus), and the odor also improved memory of this learned avoidance. However, to date no research has examined this response to pyrazine odor using wild birds under natural conditions. This study used wild robins (Erithacus rubecula) to investigate whether wild birds avoided yellow baits that smelled of pyrazine more strongly than those presented with no odor. The results provide some evidence that pyrazine odor does increase the level of protection an aposematic insect gains from a wild avian predator, but that the effect of pyrazine on learned avoidance was much weaker than was found with domestic chicks .
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期208-214,共7页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 APOSEMATISM Learned avoidance Memory Multimodal warning display PYRAZINE ROBINS 野生鸟类 学习率 记忆性 气味 吡嗪 捕食昆虫 多式联运 显示
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Barnea A, Gvaryahu G, Rothschild M, 2004. The effect of the odor of pyrazine and colors on recall of past events and learn- ing in the domestic chick Gallus gallus domesticus. In: van Emden H, Rothschild Med. Insect and Bird Interactions. An- dover, Hampshire, UK: Intercept Ltd.
  • 2Cramp S, 1998. The Complete Birds of the Western Palearctic on CD-ROM. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 3Edmunds M, 1974. Defence in Animals: A Survey of Anti-predator Defences. New York: Longman.
  • 4Gittleman JL, Harvey PH, 1980. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 286: 149.
  • 5Guilford T, Dawkins MS, 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42: 1-4.
  • 6Jetz J, Rowe C, Guilford T, 2000. Non-warning odors trigger innate color aversions: As long as they are novel. Behavioural Ecology 12:134-139.
  • 7Marples NM, Roper TJ, 1996. Effects of novel colour and smell on the response of naive chicks towards food and water. Ani- mal Behaviour 51: 1417-1424.
  • 8Marples NM, Roper TJ, 1997 Response of domestic chicks to methyl anthranilate odour. Animal B ehaviour 53:1263-1270.
  • 9Marples NM, Roper TJ, Harper DGC, 1998. Responses of wild birds to novel prey: Evidence of dietary conservatism. Oikos 83: 161-165.
  • 10Moore BE Brown WV, Rothschild M, 1990. Methoxyal- kylpyrazines in aposematic insects, their host plants and mi- mics. Chemoecology 1:43-51.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部