期刊文献+

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: Progress in humans since white paper 被引量:13

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: Progress in humans since white paper
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Since the first description of the concept of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), a substantial number of clinical NOTES reports have appeared in the literature. This editorial reviews the available human data addressing research questions originally proposed by the white paper, including determining the optimal method of access for NOTES, developing safe methods of lumenal closure, suturing and anastomotic devices, advanced multitasking platforms, addressing the risk of infection, managing complications, addressing challenges with visualization, and training for NOTES procedures. An analysis of the literature reveals that so far transvaginal access and closure appear to be the most feasible techniques for NOTES, with a limited, but growing transgastric, transrectal, and transesophageal NOTES experience in humans. The theoretically increased risk of infection as a result of NOTES procedures has not been substantiated in transvaginal and transgastric procedures so far. Development of suturing and anastomotic devices and advanced platforms for NOTES has progressed slowly, with limited clinical data on their use so far. Data onthe optimal management and incidence of intraoperative complications remain sparse, although possible factors contributing to complications are discussed. Finally, this editorial discusses the likely direction of future NOTES development and its possible role in clinical practice. Since the first description of the concept of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), a substantial number of clinical NOTES reports have appeared in the literature. This editorial reviews the available human data addressing research questions originally proposed by the white paper, including determining the optimal method of access for NOTES, developing safe methods of lumenal closure, suturing and anastomotic devices, advanced multitasking platforms, addressing the risk of infection, managing complications, addressing challenges with visualization, and training for NOTES procedures. An analysis of the literature reveals that so far transvaginal access and closure appear to be the most feasible techniques for NOTES, with a limited, but growing transgastric, transrectal, and transesophageal NOTES experience in humans. The theoretically increased risk of infection as a result of NOTES procedures has not been substantiated in transvaginal and transgastric procedures so far. Development of suturing and anastomotic devices and advanced platforms for NOTES has progressed slowly, with limited clinical data on their use so far. Data onthe optimal management and incidence of intraoperative complications remain sparse, although possible factors contributing to complications are discussed. Finally, this editorial discusses the likely direction of future NOTES development and its possible role in clinical practice.
机构地区 Department of Surgery
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第13期1655-1665,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 白皮书 内窥镜 人类 手术 孔口 自然 NOTES 多任务平台 Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery Outcomes Complications Endoscopic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:329-333.
  • 2Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DA, Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): A Technical Review. Surg Endosc 2011; In press.
  • 3Bueno B. [Primer Caso de Apendicectomia Por Via Vaginal]. Tokoginecol Pract 1949; 8:152-158.
  • 4Gordts S, Watrelot A, Campo R, Brosens I. Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:1238-1241.
  • 5Moore ML, Cohen M, Liu GY. Experience with 109 cases of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10:282-285.
  • 6Shibahara H, Shimada K, Kikuchi K, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Fujiwara H, Suzuki M. Major complications and outcome of diagnostic and operative transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007; 33:705-709.
  • 7Tsin DA, Bumaschny E, Helman M, Colombero LT. Culdolaparoscopic oophorectomy with vaginal hysterectomy: an optional minimal-access surgical technique, l Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12:269-271.
  • 8Michalik M, Orlowski M, Bobowicz M, Frask A, Trybull A. The First Report on Hybrid NOTES Adjustable Gastric Banding in Human. Obes Surg 2010; Epub ahead of print.
  • 9Decarli LA, Zorron R, Branco A, Lima FC, Tang M, Pioneer SR, Sanseverino JI, Menguer R, Bigolin AV, Gagner M. New hybrid approach for NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical experience. Surg Innov 2009; 16:181-186.
  • 10Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V, Atas Y, Fritze F, Burghardt J, Elling D, Gellert K. Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2444-2452.

同被引文献56

引证文献13

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部