期刊文献+

Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume measurements with 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging 被引量:2

Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume measurements with 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) of articular cartilage represents a powerful tool in osteoarthritis research, but has so far been confined to a field strength of 1.5 T. The aim of the study was to determine the reproducibility and accuracy of qMRI assessments of the knee cartilage volume by comparing quantitative swine cartilage volumes of the sagittal (sag) multi echo data imagine combination water-excitation (MEDICwe) sequence and the fast low-angle shoot water-excitation (FLASHwe) sequence at 3.0-T MRI to directly measured volumes (DMV) of the surgically removed articular cartilage.Methods Test-retest MRI was acquired in 20 swine knees. Two sag FLASHwe sequences and two sag MEDICwe sequences (spatial resolution 0.4 mm × 0.4 mm × 1.0 mm of 3-dimension (3D) were acquired at 3-T MRI in a knee.Articular cartilage volume was calculated from 3D reformations of the MRI by using a manual program. Calculated volumes were compared with DMV of the surgically removed articular cartilage. Knee joint cartilage plates were quantified paired in order.Results In the knee joint of swine, reproducibility errors (paired analysis) for cartilage volume were 2.5% to 3.2% with sag FLASHwe, and 1.6% to 3.0% with sag MEDICwe. Correlation coefficients between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from 0.90 to 0.98 for cartilage volume. Systematic pairwise difference between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from -1.1% to 2.8%. Random pairwise differences between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from (2.9 ±2.4)% to (6.8±4.5)%.Conclusions FLASHwe and MEDICwe sequences permit highly accurate and reproducible analysis of cartilage volume in the knee joints of swine at 3-T MRI. Cartilage volume reproducibility for the MEDICwe data is slightly higher than the FLASHwe data. Background Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) of articular cartilage represents a powerful tool in osteoarthritis research, but has so far been confined to a field strength of 1.5 T. The aim of the study was to determine the reproducibility and accuracy of qMRI assessments of the knee cartilage volume by comparing quantitative swine cartilage volumes of the sagittal (sag) multi echo data imagine combination water-excitation (MEDICwe) sequence and the fast low-angle shoot water-excitation (FLASHwe) sequence at 3.0-T MRI to directly measured volumes (DMV) of the surgically removed articular cartilage.Methods Test-retest MRI was acquired in 20 swine knees. Two sag FLASHwe sequences and two sag MEDICwe sequences (spatial resolution 0.4 mm × 0.4 mm × 1.0 mm of 3-dimension (3D) were acquired at 3-T MRI in a knee.Articular cartilage volume was calculated from 3D reformations of the MRI by using a manual program. Calculated volumes were compared with DMV of the surgically removed articular cartilage. Knee joint cartilage plates were quantified paired in order.Results In the knee joint of swine, reproducibility errors (paired analysis) for cartilage volume were 2.5% to 3.2% with sag FLASHwe, and 1.6% to 3.0% with sag MEDICwe. Correlation coefficients between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from 0.90 to 0.98 for cartilage volume. Systematic pairwise difference between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from -1.1% to 2.8%. Random pairwise differences between results obtained with qMRI and DMV ranged from (2.9 ±2.4)% to (6.8±4.5)%.Conclusions FLASHwe and MEDICwe sequences permit highly accurate and reproducible analysis of cartilage volume in the knee joints of swine at 3-T MRI. Cartilage volume reproducibility for the MEDICwe data is slightly higher than the FLASHwe data.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第8期1251-1256,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 ACCURACY CARTILAGE magnetic resonance imaging REPRODUCIBILITY VOLUME accuracy cartilage magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility volume
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Louboutin H,Debarge R,Richou J,Selmi TA,Donell ST,Neyret P,et al.Osteoarthritis in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture:a review of risk factors.Knee 2009; 16:239-244.
  • 2Graichen H,von Eisenhart-Rothe R,Vogl T,Englmeier KH,Eckstein F.Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging:technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:811-816.
  • 3Peterfy CG.Imaging of the disease process.Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14:590-596.
  • 4Conrozier T,Brandt K,Pipemo M,Mathieu P,Merle-Vincent F,Vignon E.Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of a new method of computer measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis.Performance of three radiographic views obtained at a 3-year interval.Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:864-870.
  • 5Maheu E,Cadet C,Marty M,Dougados M,Ghabri S,Kerloch I,et al.Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of various methods to measure joint space width in osteoarthritis of the hip:a double reading of three different radiographic views taken with a three-year interval.Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7:1375-1385.
  • 6Kuzmanova SI.Arthroscopic evaluation of chondropathy in knee osteoarthritis.Folia Med 2000; 42:16-18.
  • 7Goodwin DW.MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the knee.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2009; 13:326-339.
  • 8Gray ML,Eckstein F,Peterfy C,Dahlberg L,Kim YJ,Sorensen AG.Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis.Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 (Supple); S175-S 181.
  • 9,Hodgson R J,Connor PO,Moots R.MRI of rheumatoid arthritis-image quantitation for the assessment of disease activity,progression and response to therapy.Rheumatology 2008; 47:13-21.
  • 10Phan CM,Link TM,Blumenkrantz G,Dunn TC,Ries MD,Steinbach LS,et al.MR imaging findings in the follow-up of patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis and the correlation with clinical symptoms.Eur Radiol 2006; 16:608-618.

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部