期刊文献+

腹腔镜和开腹全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术并发症文献分析

Document Analysis of Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery with Ileal Pouch anal Anastomosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜和开腹行全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合出现术后并发症的危险性。方法:检索、收集已发表的关于腹腔镜和开腹两种方法行全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术的对照研究,按meta分析要求,应用Review Manager 4.2软件对其结果进行分析,计算腹腔镜组与开腹组术后并发症危险性的优势比(OR)、95%可信区间(CI)及P值。结果:腹腔镜组术后总并发症、肠梗阻、吻合口漏及尿路感染发生率高于开腹组,但P值均>0.05;术后腹腔脓肿、切口感染、肺感染及再次手术干预的发生率低于开腹组,但P值均>0.05。结论:腹腔镜行全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术是安全的,可行的。 Objective To explore the risk of postoperative complications of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery with ileal pouch anal anastomosis.Methods The published control study included two different methods with ileal pouch anal anastomosis,laparoscopic surgery and laparotomic surgery,was searched and collected.The literature was strictly selected based on the demand of meta-analysis,and its results were analyzed by Review Manager 4.2 software.The odds ratio (OR),95% confidence interval (95% CI),and P value were calculated to assess the risk of postoperative complications of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery with IPAA.Results The incidences of total complications,ileus,anastomotic leak and urinary tract infection were higher of laparoscopic surgery with IPAA compared with open surgery,but the inferiority was of no significant difference between them (P〉0.05).The incidences of intra-abdominal abscess,wound infection,pulmonary infection and surgical reintervention were lower of laparoscopic surgery with IPAA compared with open surgery,but the superiority was of no significant difference between them (P〉0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery with IPAA is safe and feasible.
出处 《中国中西医结合外科杂志》 CAS 2011年第2期138-142,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术 开腹手术 腹腔镜手术 META分析 ileal pouch anal anastomosis open surgery laparoscopic surgery meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Muir AJ,Edwards LJ,Sanders LL,et al.A prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2001,96:1480.
  • 2S.P.Bach,N.J.M.Mortensen,et al.Revolution and evolution:30 years of ileoanal pouch surgery[J].Inflammatory Bowel Diseases,2006,12(2):131.
  • 3Hashimoto A,Funayama Y,Naito H,et al.(2001) Laparoscopeassisted versus conventional restorative proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy[J].Surg Today,2001,1:210.
  • 4Maartense S,Dunker MS,Slors JF,et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis.A randomized trial[J].Ann Surg,2004,240:984.
  • 5Larson DW,Cima RR,Dozois EJ,et al.Safety,feasibility,and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.A single institutional case-matched experience[J].Ann Surg,2004,243:667.
  • 6Zhang HF,Hu SY,Zhang GY,et al.Laparoscopic versus open proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2007,16(3):187.
  • 7Mehdi Oua(i)ssi,Jérémie H.Lefevre,et al.Laparoscopic 3-step Restorative Proctocolectomy Comparative Study With Open Approach in 45 Patients[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2008,18:357.
  • 8B.B.McGuire,A.E.Brannigan,et al.Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis[J].British Journal of Surgery,2007,94(7):812.
  • 9Holubar SD,Privitera A,Cima RR,et al.Minimally invasive total proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy for ulcerative colitis[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis,2009,15(9):1337.
  • 10Marcello PW,Milsom JW,Wong SK,et al.Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2000,43:604.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部