期刊文献+

术前功能对初次人工全髋关节置换术后早期功能的影响 被引量:1

Impact of preoperative function on early postoperative outcome after primary total hip arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨术前功能状态对初次全髋关节置换术(THA)术后早期功能的影响。[方法]对2006年1月~2008年1月期间在本科行初次非骨水泥型全髋关节置换的髋关节骨性关节炎95例患者进行随访研究,其中男49例,女46例,平均年龄62.7岁(50~76周岁),随访时间大于24个月。根据患者术前Harris评分(HHS)将患者分为三组(A组,<45;B组45~55;C组>55),使用Harris评分、美国简明健康测量量表(SF-36)、西安大略大学和麦克马斯特骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)对患者术后6、12、24个月进行调查,并对组间同一时期和组内不同时期的评分结果进行统计学分析。[结果]A组患者在术后的HHS评分、SF-36、WOMAC中均表现出较差的结果,术后功能与术前HHS评分有关,而术后的活动度和畸形与之无关。[结论]术前较差的功能对术后患者早期功能恢复带来了不良的影响,同时延长了术后疼痛的时间。在功能下降的过程中较早实施THA可能会带来较好的术后功能。 [Objective]To investigate the impact of preoperative functional status on early postoperative outcomes after total hip arthroplasty(THA).[Methods]Forty-nine men and 46 women aged 50 to 76 years who underwent cementless THA for osteoarthritis were followed up for at least 2 years.Patients were evaluated pre-and post-operatively(at 6,12,and 24 months) using the Harris Hip Score(HHS),36-item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36),and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC).Patients were classifed into 3 groups based on their preoperative HHS(group A45;group B 45~55;and group C55).Differences between and within groups were compared.[Results] Patients with a poor preoperative HHS had worse early postoperative outcomes in terms of HHS,SF-36,and WOMAC.Postoperative function was correlated with preoperative HHS,but postoperative range of motion and deformity was not.[Conclusion]Poor preoperative function may affect recovery unfavourably and lead to prolonged pain.Earlier THA in the course of functional decline may associate with better outcomes.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期721-723,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 关节置换 术后评估 replacement hip outcome assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Azkarate J,et al. Arcelay evaluation of ex plicit criteria for total hip joint replacement [ J ]. J Clin Epidemiol 2000,53 : 1200 - 1208.
  • 2Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002,84 : 1942 - 1948.
  • 3Kim YG, Kim SY, Kim S J, et al. The use of cementless expansion ace- tabular component and an alumina -polyethylene bearing in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2005,87:776 - 780.
  • 4MacWilliam CH ,Yood MU ,Vetoer JJ ,et al. Patient -related risk fac- tors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement [ J ]. Health Serv Res, 1996,31:623 - 638.
  • 5薛源,贺加.SF-36量表应用于人工髋关节置换患者生命质量测定的效果评价[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(7):507-509. 被引量:30
  • 6Garbuz DS, Xu M, Duncan CP, et al. Delays worsen quality of life oat- come of primary total hip arthroplasty[ J]. Clin Orthop,2006,447:79 - 84.
  • 7Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, et al. Health related quality of life outcomcs after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population[ J ]. J Rheumatol,2000 ,27 :1745 - 1752.
  • 8Johansson HR, Bergschmidt P, Skripitz R, et al. Impact of preoperative function on early postoperative outcome after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Orthop Surg,2010,1:6 - 10.
  • 9Roder C, Staub LP, Eggli S, et al. Infuence of preoperative functional status on outcome after total hip arthroplasty [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2007,89:11 - 17.
  • 10Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, et al. Timing of total joint replace- ment affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee[ J]. Arthritis Rheum,2002,46:3327 -3330.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Irrgan JJ, Snydr - Mackler L, Wainner RS, et al. Development of a patient reported measure of function of the knee [ J ] . Bone Join Surg (Am), 1998, 80: 11132-11453.
  • 2Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36 ) . I. Conceptual framework and item selection [J] . Med Care, 1992, 6:473 -483.
  • 3Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF -36 health survey manual and interpretation guide [ M ] . Boston, M A : The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993, 1 -12.
  • 4Harris WH. Results of uncemented cups: a critical appraisal at 15 years [J] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003:121 -125.
  • 5Chauhan SK, Scott RC, Breidahl W, et al. Computer- assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig - based technique. A randomised, prospective trial [J] . Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, 86: 372 - 377.
  • 6李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2153

共引文献29

同被引文献9

  • 1Ware J Jr,Kosinski M,Keller SD.A 12-Item Short-Form HealthSurvey:construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability andvalidity[J].Med Care,1996,3:220-233.
  • 2Tucker G,Adams R,Wilson D.New Australian population scoringcoefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 healthstatus questionnaires[J].Qual Life Res,2010,7:1069-1076.
  • 3Johnson JA,Pickard AS.Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta,Canada[J].Med Care,2000,1:115-121.
  • 4Wera GD,Gillespie RJ,Petty C,et al.Revision of hip resurfacingarthroplasty[J].Am J Orthop(Belle Mead NJ),2010,8:78-83.
  • 5Bentur N,King Y.The challenge of validating SF-12 for its usewith community-dwelling elderly in Israel[J].Qual Life Res,2010,1:91-95.
  • 6Garavaglia G,Lubbeke A,Barea C,et al.Ten-year results with theMorscher press-fit cup:an uncemented,non-modular,porous-coated cup inserted without screws[J].Int Orthop,2011,7:957-963.
  • 7Ostendorf M,van SHF,Buskens E,et al.Patient-reported outcomein total hip replacement.A comparison of five instruments of healthstatus[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2004,6:801-808.
  • 8薛源,贺加.SF-36量表应用于人工髋关节置换患者生命质量测定的效果评价[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(7):507-509. 被引量:30
  • 9李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2153

引证文献1

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部