期刊文献+

形式—功能错位的三种解释途径 被引量:9

Three Accounts of the Mismatch Between Form and Function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形式—功能错位是指语言实体在进入句法环境后表现出的形式与功能的不同构现象。目前对于形式—功能错位主要有三种解释途径:概念函项和语义算子插入、构式压制以及转喻。本文在概括已有研究内容的基础上主要评析这三种解释途径各自的得失。 Form-function mismatch refers to the incongruity between linguistic entities and the morphosyntactic configurations involved.Studies on the resolution of form-function mismatch can be categorized into three main accounts,namely,function and operator interpolation,constructional coercion,and metonymy.This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of each account and advances our views.
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期17-23,127,共7页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"语言非范畴化研究"(07BYY002)
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1张韧.界性的灵活性:词汇、构式与概念观照[J].外语教学与研究,2009,41(5):329-336. 被引量:19
  • 2Brdar, M. Metonymies we live without [ C ] // Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009.
  • 3De Swart, H. Aspect shift and coercion [ J ]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1998, 16:347 -385.
  • 4De Swart, H. Coercion in a cmss-hnguistic theory of aspect [ C ] //E. Francis, Laura A. Michaelis. Mismatch : Formfunction Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003:231-258.
  • 5Francis, E. & Laura A. Michaelis. Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory [ C ] // E. Francis & Laura A. Michaelis. Mismatch : Form-function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003 : 1 - 26.
  • 6Gibbs, Jr., Raymond. meaning construction [ C ] Meaning Construction. Experimental tests of figurative // G. Radden, et al. Aspects of phia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007 : 19 - 32.
  • 7Goldberg, A. Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 8Goldberg, A. Constructions at Work : The Nature of Generalization in Language [ M ]. Oxford: OUP, 2006.
  • 9Grtinder, S. Aspectual shift via supervaluation [C] // Ville Nurmi & Dmitry Sustretov. Proceedings of the Twelfth ESSLLI Student Session, 2007.
  • 10Jackendoff, R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty [M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.

二级参考文献25

  • 1张韧.平行式框架下的认知语义研究[J].外国语,2005,28(1):30-40. 被引量:6
  • 2张韧.转喻的构式化表征[J].外国语,2007,30(2):21-28. 被引量:25
  • 3张韧.认知语法视野下的构式研究[J].外语研究,2007,24(3):35-40. 被引量:46
  • 4Chierchia, G. 2003. Language, thought and reality after Chomksy [R]. University of Milan.
  • 5Doetjes, J. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English [D]. Leiden University.
  • 6Fromkin, V. (ed.). 2000. Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory [C]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 7Gillon, B. 1999. The lexical semantics of English count and mass nouns [A]. In E. Viegas (ed.). The Breath and Depth of Semantic Lexicons[C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 19-37.
  • 8Huddleston, R. & G. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 9Jackendoff, R. 1991. Parts and boundaries [J]. Cognition 41: 9-45.
  • 10Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

同被引文献112

引证文献9

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部