2WALSH WR, MORBERG P, YU Y,et al. Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft substitute in a eonfined cancellous defect[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003,406 ( 1 ) : 228-236.
3ORSINI G, RICCI J, SCARANO A, et al. Bone-defect healing with calcium-sulfate particles and cement: an experimental study in rabbit[J]. J Biomed Mater Res,2004,68(2): 199-208.
4Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedies. Orthopedics, 2002,25(11):1301-1309.
5Pietrzak WS, Ronk R. Calcium Sulfate bone void filler: a review and a look ahead. J Craniofac Surg, 2000, 11(4):327-334.
6Vaccaro AR. The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopedics, 2002, 25(5S): S571-578.
7Jamali A, Hilpert A, Debes J, et al. hydroxyapatite/calcium carbonate (HA/CC) vs. plaster of Partis: a histomorphometric and radiographic stody in a rabbit tibial defect model. Calcif Tissue Int, 2002, 71(2):172-178.
8Gitelis S, Piasecki P, Turner T, et al. Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. Orthopedics, 2001,24(2):162-166.
9Walsh WR, Morberg P,Yu Y, et al. Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft substitute in a confined cancellous defect. Clin Orthop,2003,406: 228-236.
10Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, et al. The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, 382: 42-50.
