期刊文献+

Empirical evaluation of confidence and prediction intervals for spatial models of forest structure in Jalisco,Mexico 被引量:3

Empirical evaluation of confidence and prediction intervals for spatial models of forest structure in Jalisco,Mexico
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In recent years there has been an increasing interest in developing spatial statistical models for data sets that are seemingly spatially independent.This lack of spatial structure makes it difficult,if not impossible to use optimal predictors such as ordinary kriging for modeling the spatial variability in the data.In many instances,the data still contain a wealth of information that could be used to gain flexibility and precision in estimation.In this paper we propose using a combination of regression analysis to describe the large-scale spatial variability in a set of survey data and a tree-based stratification design to enhance the estimation process of the small-scale spatial variability.With this approach,sample units(i.e.,pixel of a satellite image) are classified with respect to predictions of error attributes into homogeneous classes,and the classes are then used as strata in the stratified analysis.Independent variables used as a basis of stratification included terrain data and satellite imagery.A decision rule was used to identify a tree size that minimized the error in estimating the variance of the mean response and prediction uncertainties at new spatial locations.This approach was applied to a set of n=937 forested plots from a state-wide inventory conducted in 2006 in the Mexican State of Jalisco.The final models accounted for 62% to 82% of the variability observed in canopy closure(%),basal area(m2·ha-1),cubic volumes(m3·ha-1) and biomass(t·ha-1) on the sample plots.The spatial models provided unbiased estimates and when averaged over all sample units in the population,estimates of forest structure were very close to those obtained using classical estimates based on the sampling strategy used in the state-wide inventory.The spatial models also provided unbiased estimates of model variances leading to confidence and prediction coverage rates close to the 0.95 nominal rate. In recent years there has been an increasing interest in developing spatial statistical models for data sets that are seemingly spatially independent.This lack of spatial structure makes it difficult,if not impossible to use optimal predictors such as ordinary kriging for modeling the spatial variability in the data.In many instances,the data still contain a wealth of information that could be used to gain flexibility and precision in estimation.In this paper we propose using a combination of regression analysis to describe the large-scale spatial variability in a set of survey data and a tree-based stratification design to enhance the estimation process of the small-scale spatial variability.With this approach,sample units(i.e.,pixel of a satellite image) are classified with respect to predictions of error attributes into homogeneous classes,and the classes are then used as strata in the stratified analysis.Independent variables used as a basis of stratification included terrain data and satellite imagery.A decision rule was used to identify a tree size that minimized the error in estimating the variance of the mean response and prediction uncertainties at new spatial locations.This approach was applied to a set of n=937 forested plots from a state-wide inventory conducted in 2006 in the Mexican State of Jalisco.The final models accounted for 62% to 82% of the variability observed in canopy closure(%),basal area(m2·ha-1),cubic volumes(m3·ha-1) and biomass(t·ha-1) on the sample plots.The spatial models provided unbiased estimates and when averaged over all sample units in the population,estimates of forest structure were very close to those obtained using classical estimates based on the sampling strategy used in the state-wide inventory.The spatial models also provided unbiased estimates of model variances leading to confidence and prediction coverage rates close to the 0.95 nominal rate.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第2期159-166,共8页 林业研究(英文版)
关键词 tree-based stratified design generalized least squares standardized mean squared error Landsat-7 ETM+ tree-based stratified design generalized least squares standardized mean squared error Landsat-7 ETM+
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Agterberg FP. 1984. Trend surface analysis. In: G.L. Gaile and C.J. Willmott, (eds.), Spatial statistics and model. Reidel: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 147-171.
  • 2Akaike H. 1973. lnfomaation theory and and extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: N. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds), Second International Symposioum on Information Theory. Hmagarian Academy Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 268-281. Repreinted 1992 in Breakthroughs in Statistics, S. Kotz and N. Johnson (eds), 1:610-624, Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
  • 3Bl0ch DA, Segal MR. 1989. Empirical comparison of approaches to forming strata - using classification trees to adjust for covariates. J Amer Statist Assoc, 84: 896-905.
  • 4Benedetti R, Espa G, Lafratta G. 2005. A tree-based approach to forming strata in multipurpose business surveys. Discussion Paper No. 5, 2005, Di- partimento di Economia, Universita Degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy. p.17.
  • 5Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci, 35:881 902.
  • 6Brown S, Inverson LR. 1992. Biomass estimates for tropical forests of South and Southeast Asia. World Resource Review, 4: 366--384.
  • 7Brieman L, Freidman J, Olshen R, Stone C. 1984. Classification and Regres- sion trees. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks, p.358.
  • 8Carroll SS, Pearson D. 2000. Detecting and modeling spatial and temporal dependence in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 14:1893-1897.
  • 9Cocchi D, Fabrizi E, Raggi M, Trivisano C. 2002. Regression trees based stratification: an application to the analysis of the Italian post enumeration survey. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Improving Sur- veys, August 25-28,200, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.icis.dk/ICIS- papers/B2_5_2.pdf.
  • 10Cressie N. 1991. Statistics for spatial data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 928 pp.

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部