仲裁中的证据能力规则——以诉讼与仲裁机制的差异为视角

On the Rules of Competency of Evidence for Arbitration-from the Perspective of Difference Between Litigation and Arbitration Procedure

通过对有关立法和仲裁规则进行比较分析,探讨仲裁中证据能力规则的具体表现,研究仲裁和诉讼中证据能力规则的差异及产生原因,认为仲裁的性质、审理方式、证据调查方式、仲裁庭的组成、仲裁的目的是影响仲裁程序中证据能力规则运用的重要因素。并对我国的立法和仲裁规则进行分析,认为仲裁程序中不能适用诉讼证据能力规则,对于仲裁程序中证据能力规则的运用应当强化当事人协商的作用。

There is a comparison of provisions of the representative countries and relevant arbitration rules.This paper analyses the specific performance of competency of evidence for arbitration,and differences between arbitration and litigation.The important factors affecting the competency of evidence for arbitration are the nature of arbitration,trial,evidence investigation,the composition of the arbitral tribunal,and the purpose of arbitration.Based on analysis of China's legislature and relevant arbitration rules,the paper makes two points that rules of competency of evidence for the litigation should not be applied to the arbitration and the agreement of parties should be strengthened.