期刊文献+

产品伤害危机后销售促进对消费者购买意愿影响研究 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文分析了产品伤害危机后的两种主要的销售促进:金钱性促销和非金钱性促销,建立了促销方式通过感知风险和感知价值影响消费者购买意愿的作用模型,研究了不同的促销方式对危机后消费者购买意愿的影响,同时研究了消费者性别对于危机后促销方式与消费者购买意愿之间关系的调节作用。研究表明,产品伤害危机后,非金钱性促销比金钱性促销能更好地降低消费者感知风险,提高消费者感知价值,从而能更好地提高消费者购买意愿。同时,男性和女性在不同促销方式下的感知风险有所不同,在非金钱性促销方式下,男性有更低的感知风险和更高的购买意愿。
作者 董亚妮 李蔚
出处 《西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期166-170,共5页 Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 2010年教育部人文社会科学研究项目"农产品伤害危机后的市场恢复研究"(10YJA630045)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1菲利浦·科特勒.市场营销原理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2001.
  • 2Aaker,David A.Toward A Normative Model of Promotional Decision Making[J].Management Science,1973,19(6).
  • 3Diamond,W.D.Schemas Determing the Incentive Value of Sales Promotions[J].Psychology and Marketing,1990,7(3).
  • 4Mitchell A A,Olson J.Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1981,18(4).
  • 5Rindfleisch,Aric,David X.Crockett.Cigarette Smoking and Perceived Risk:A Multidimensional Investigation[J].Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,1999,18 (Fall).
  • 6Zeithaml,Valarie A.(1988) Consumer Perceptions of Price,Quality,and Value:A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence[J].Journal of Marketing,1988,52 (3).
  • 7冯建英,穆维松,傅泽田.消费者的购买意愿研究综述[J].现代管理科学,2006(11):7-9. 被引量:152
  • 8Thaler,Richard (1985).Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.Marketing Science,1985,4 (3).
  • 9Campbell,Leland,William D.Diamond.Framing and Sales Promotion:The Characteristics of A Good Deal[J].Journal of Consumer Marketing.1990,7(4).
  • 10Raghubir,P.,Corfman,L P.When Do Price Promotions Affect Brand Evaluations?[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1999,36 (2).

二级参考文献6

共引文献151

同被引文献74

  • 1王晓玉,晁钢令,吴纪元.产品伤害危机及其处理过程对消费者考虑集的影响[J].管理世界,2006,22(5):86-95. 被引量:96
  • 2吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:181-184.
  • 3阎俊 佘秋玲.消费者抵制的心理机制研究.营销科学学报,2010,(6):98-110.
  • 4Laufer, D. , Gillespie, K. Differences in Con- sumer Attributions of Blame between Men and Women: The Role of Perceived Vulnerability and Empathic Con- cern[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2004, 21 (2):141 - 157.
  • 5Laufer, D. , Silvera, David H. , Meyer, T. Ex- ploring Differences between Older and Younger Consumers Inattributions of Blame for Product Harm Crises [ J ]. A- cademy of Marketing Science Review, 2005, 2005 (7) : 1 -21.
  • 6Dawar, N. , Pillutla, Madan M. Impact of Prod- uct- harm Crisis on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations [ J ]. Journal of Marketing Re- search, 2000, 37(2) :215 -226.
  • 7Folkes, V. S. Consumer Reactions to Product Failure : An Attributional Approach [ J ]. Journal of Con- sumer Research, 1984, 10(4): 398-409.
  • 8Klein, J. , Dawar, N. Corporate Social Respon- sibility and Consumers' Attributions and Brand Evalua- tions in a Product - Harm Crisis [ J ]. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2004, 21(3) : 203 -217.
  • 9Siomkos, G., Triantafillidou, A., Vassiliko- poulou, A. , Tsiamis, I. Opportunities and Threats for Competitors in Product - harm Crises [ J ]. Marketing In- telligence & Planning, 2010, 28 (6) : 770 - 791.
  • 10Klemperer, P. Market with Consumer Switc- hing Costs [ J ]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987, 102(2) : 375 -394.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部