期刊文献+

ROC曲线在评价铅中毒指标中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Assessment of Indicators for Lead Poisoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价几种铅中毒指标筛选不同水平职业性铅接触的准确性。方法连续性收集157名铅接触工人的血标本,同时测定血铅、红细胞游离原卟啉(FEP)、锌原卟啉(ZPP)、尿铅、尿δ氨基酮戊酸(δALA),以血铅≥40、≥60μg/dl的铅接触水平为金标准,用ReceiverOperatingCharacteristic(ROC受试者工作特征)曲线分析软件评价所测定指标筛选血铅≥40、≥60μg/dl职业性铅接触的价值,在ROC曲线上制定各测定指标筛选上述2个铅接触水平的最佳临界点,用EPINFOR统计软件比较筛选血铅≥40、≥60μg/dl的平行试验的敏感度。结果筛选血铅≥40、≥60μg/dl的铅接触水平,ROC曲线下的面积(AUCROC)最大的是ZPP,其他依次为FEP、尿铅、尿δALA;联合ZPP与FEP的平行试验的敏感度高于联合尿铅与尿δALA的平行试验。结论筛选血铅≥40、≥60μg/dl水平的职业性铅接触,ZPP的准确性最高,并且联合ZPP与FEP的平行试验的敏感度高于联合尿铅与尿δALA的平行试验。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of several indicators for lead poisoning in screening for occupational lead exposure to varied extent.Methods Blood specimens from 157 workers exposed to lead were collected and determined for levels of blood lead,free erythrocyte protoporphyrin(FEP),zinc protoporphyrin(ZPP),urine lead and δ aminolevulinic acid(δ ALA),Golden standards for lead exposure were defined as blood lead levels greater than 40 and 60 μg/dl,respectively.Diagnostic value for occupational exposure to lead with blood lead levels of greater than 40 and 60 μg/dl was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve software,and optimal cut off points for the above mentioned indicators for screening those with blood lead levels greater than 40 and 60 μg/dl were determined on the ROC curve.Sensitivity of biphasic screening in series with blood lead levels of greater than 40 and 60 μg/dl was compared with EPINFOR software.Results For screening those with blood lead levels greater than 40 and 60 μg/dl,ZPP covered the maximal area under the ROC curve(AUC ROC ),and the next was FEP,urine lead,and δ ALA.Sensitivity of screening with both ZPP and FEP in parallel was higher than that with both urine lead and δ ALA.Conclusion ZPP was the most accurate indicator for screening those occupational exposed with blood lead levels greater than 40 and 60μg/dl,and sensitivity of both ZPP with FEP was higher than that of both urine lead with δ ALA.
出处 《中国工业医学杂志》 CAS 1999年第4期199-202,共4页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Medicine
关键词 铅中毒指标 铅接触 ROC曲线 铅中毒 Indicators for lead poisoning, Exposure to lead, Receiver operating characteristic curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献5

  • 1薛汉麟,中华医学杂志,1987年,67卷,23页
  • 2潘志擎,中华劳动卫生与职业病杂志,1985年,3期,45页
  • 3罗莲君,工业卫生与职业病,1983年,9期,231页
  • 4屈家瑛,中华劳动卫生与职业病杂志,1983年,1期,107页
  • 5张之南,血液病诊断及疗效标准(第2版),1998年,1-5,10-15页

共引文献44

同被引文献22

  • 1张基美.铅中毒实验室诊断指标研究进展[J].中国工业医学杂志,1994,7(5):282-284. 被引量:8
  • 2张庆荣,周坚,黄绮玲,尹碧容,陈伦能,曾玫玫,苏蓓,朱文彪.铅暴露对一氧化氮及氧自由基代谢的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2005,13(4):293-295. 被引量:2
  • 3张若扬,欧阳惠珊,丁尉兰.职业性铅接触人员五项生物学指标检验的价值及相关性调查[J].职业卫生与病伤,1996,11(3):140-142. 被引量:4
  • 4王刚垛,任永清,黄芙蓉,孙爱敏,林瑞存.铅慢性肾损伤敏感指标的研究[J].工业卫生与职业病,1996,22(2):89-92. 被引量:7
  • 5Chia KS, Jeyaratnam J, Lee J, et al. Lead_induced nephropathy: relationship between various biological exposure indices and early markers of nephrotoxicity[J].Am J Ind Med, 1995, 27: 883- 895.
  • 6Chia KS, Mutti A, Alinovi R, et al.Urinary excretion of tubular brush-border antigens among lead exposed workers[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore,1994, 23: 655- 659.
  • 7Hu H, Rabinowitz M, Smith D, et al. Bone lead as a biological marker in epidemiologic studies of chronic toxicity: conceptual paradigms[J].Environ Health perspect,1998, 106: 1- 8.
  • 8Sakai T.Biomarkers of lead exposure[J].Ind Health,2000, 38: 127- 142.
  • 9Paglia DE, Renner SW , Bhambhani K,et al .Differential effects of lowlead exposure on the natural isozymes of erythrocyte 5'- nu cleotidase[J].Clin Biochem,1999, 32: 193- 199.
  • 10Wetmur JG, Kaya AH, Plewinska M, et al.Molecular characterization of the human delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase 2 (ALAD2) allele: implications for molecular screening of individuals for genetic susceptibility to lead poisoning[J]. Am J Hum Genet,1999, 49( 4): 757- 763.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部