期刊文献+

后路经椎间孔椎体间融合术的临床应用(附21例报告) 被引量:2

Clinical application of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:feport of 21 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨后路经椎间孔椎体间融合术进行腰椎滑脱治疗的效果。方法自2006年5月至2009年5月,对21例(23节段)腰椎滑脱患者进行TLIF手术,患者包括男7例,女14例;年龄42~67岁,平均53.6岁,根据Meyerding分级标准,Ⅰ度滑脱7例,Ⅱ度滑脱14例,术中选择采用SofamorDanek公司TENOR、CDHM8或BASIS内固定系统,SofamorDanek公司TELAMON或钛网,或CAPSTONEPeek材料融合器,术后随访包括JOA腰背痛评分标准评分、常规X线摄片、CT扫描。结果 21例患者平均随访时间26.5个月,无一例出现感染、断钉、椎间融合器下沉、后移等并发症,1例术后出现神经症状,经药物治疗后好转。手术腰椎节段不同程度融合,椎间隙高度、椎体滑移距离、腰椎前突弧度不同程度改善,融合率为90.5,腰背痛评分统计:术前(14.8±4.2)分,术后(24.9±3.5)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 TLIF是一种安全、有效、微创的技术;CT扫描可以简单、精确评估椎体融合情况。 Objective To investigate the treatment of spondylolisthesis with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Methods From May 2005 to May 2009,21 cases(23 levels) including 7 males and 14 females suffering from spondylolisthesis were treated with TLIF.The average age of the patients in this study was 53.6(from 42 to 47).In operations internal fixation systems used were TENOR or CDHM8 or BASIS from the Sofamor Danek company,and internal fusion were TELAMON or titanium mesh cage or CAPSTONE Peek from the Sofamor Danek company.The change in the Japanese Orthopedics Association score,the recovery rate,and radiographic findings were evaluated.Results All cases were followed up for 12~47 months(26.5 months on average) with the fusion rate of 90.5%.There were no severe complication except that symptom of nerve injury in one case who recovered after treatment with neurotrophy.Translational distance were restored from(5.9±3.3) mm preoperatively to(2.3±1.6)mm postoperatively.Respectively the JOA scores were(14.8±4.2) points preoperatively,and after surgery increased to(24.9±3.5) points.Conclusion TLIF is a safe and reliable and minimally invasive technique,and CT images are used to evaluate simply and effectively the interbody fusion.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2011年第13期40-42,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 腰椎滑脱 后路椎体间融合 CT Spondylolisthesis Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion CT
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Harms JG,Jeszenzky D.The unilateral transforammal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.Oper Orthop Traumatol,1998,6:90-102.
  • 2陈维善,朱丹杰,陈其昕,吴琼华,徐侃,陈正形.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(16):1102-1103. 被引量:13
  • 3Meyerding HW.Spindylolisthesis.Surg Gynccl.obstel,1932,54:371-377.
  • 4朱若夫,杨惠林.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床应用进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(19):1480-1482. 被引量:9
  • 5Vishteh AG,Crawford NR,Chamberlain RH,et al.Biomechanical comparison of anterior versus posterior lumbar threaded interbody fusion cages.Spine,2005,30(3):302-310.
  • 6Fritzell P,Hagg O,Wesberg P,et al.Chronic low back pain and fusion:a comparison of three surgical techniques:a prospective multicenter randomized study from Swedish lumbar study group.Spine,2002,27:1131-1144.
  • 7Salehi SA,Tawk R,Ganju A,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:surgical technique and results in 24 patients.Neurosurgery,2004,54(2):368-374.
  • 8Hackenberg L,Halm H,Bullmann V,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.Eur Spine J,2005,14(6):551-558.
  • 9李方财,陈其昕,徐侃,陈维善,吴琼华.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的早中期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):580-585. 被引量:31
  • 10Kant AP,Daum WJ,Dean SM,et al.Evaluation of lumbar spine fusion:plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and observation.Spine,1995,20:2313-2317.

二级参考文献43

  • 1陈维善,朱丹杰,陈其昕,吴琼华,徐侃,陈正形.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(16):1102-1103. 被引量:13
  • 2程维,赫兰学,郑昊,马洪顺,李晓华,李德江,李长有,张俊峰,徐松宝,宋扬,王宏家.异种骨椎间融合器椎弓根钉固定腰椎体间融合术的生物力学评价[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(19):1476-1479. 被引量:3
  • 3Hee HT, Castro FP, Majd ME et al. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord, 2001,14:533-540.
  • 4Lowe TG, Tahemia AD. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2002, (394) :64-72.
  • 5Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery,2001,48:569-575.
  • 6Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : surgical technique results in 24 patients.Neurosurgery, 2004,54:368-374.
  • 7Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the tlexibilityof the lumbar spine. Spine, 2004, 29 : E65-70.
  • 8Lowe TG, Tahemia AD, O'Brien MF, et al. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion ( TLIF ) :indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech,2002, 15:31-38.
  • 9Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.Spine, 2001, 26:567-571.
  • 10Burkus JK,Helm SE,Gomet MF,et al.Is INFUSE bone graft superior to autograft bone? an integrated analysis of clinical trials using the LTCAGE lumbar tapered fusion device[J].Spinal Disord,2003,16:113-122.

共引文献44

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部