期刊文献+

基于启发式认知偏向的税收显著性研究评述 被引量:16

Research on Tax Salience on the Basis of Heuristic Bias:A Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着行为经济学研究的深入,经济学家们从启发式认知偏向的角度出发,提出了税收显著性概念,由此修正了传统的税收模型,并将对税收显著性的研究结论运用到税制设计中。运用启发式认知偏向对税收理论进行修正所取得的进展,主要体现在以下几个方面:(1)在研究方法上,初步运用了实验研究,对税收中存在的各种现象和效应进行了考证和分析;(2)在研究视角上,将启发式认知偏向结合运用到税收理论中来,对一些传统理论无法解释的现象给出了新的有效解释;(3)在政策研究上,根据理论研究的最新结论,对实际的政策制定提出建议。这一研究也存在需要进一步完善的地方:从税收显著性的视角研究最优税收的文献尚未形成一个研究体系;针对纳税人不完全理性的理论研究比较广泛,但与税收理论的结合程度还比较低。 As more and more in-depth research has been conducted on behavioral economics,economists have developed the theory of tax salience(TS) on the basis of heuristic bias,revised traditional tax models by using TS,and ap plied TS research findings to tax designing.Revisions of tax theories based on heuristic bias are characterized by the following features:(1) In terms of method,experimentation has been used to identify and analyze various phenomena and effects in taxation;(2) in terms of approach,the concept of heuristic bias has been integrated into tax theorization,which yields new and powerful explanations of a number of phenomena that could not be explained by traditional theories;(3) in terms of attention to policy study,new findings from such theoretical explorations have been utilized to generate implications and suggestions for policy-making,which traditional theories have been unable to do.However,this approach is not free from defects.For instance,the literature on the study of optimal taxation from the perspective of tax salience has not yet reached a certain degree of maturity and systematicity.Also,research on tax payers'incomplete rationality tends to be broad but its degree of combination with tax theory is still very low.
机构地区 厦门大学财政系
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期9-15,共7页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
关键词 启发式认知偏向 税收显著性 税制改革 heuristic bias tax salience tax reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Alma Cohen, Liran Einav, 2005, "Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice" ,NBER Working Pape r, No. 11461.
  • 2Amos Tversky , Daniel Kahneman, 1974," Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases" ,Science, 185 (4157).
  • 3Amy Finkelstein, 2007, "E - Z Tax: Tax Salience and Tax Rates" ,NBER Working Paper ,No. 12924.
  • 4Arnold C. Harberger, 1964, "The Measurement of Waste", The American Economic Review,54(3).
  • 5Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, 1979, " Prospect theory : An analysis of decision under risk", Econometrica ,47 ( 2 ).
  • 6Deborah H. Schenk, 2010,"Exploiting the Salience Bias in Designing Taxes" ,New York University Law and Economics Working Paper.
  • 7Emmanuel Saez,2009,"Do Tax Filers Bunch at Kink Points? Evidence, Elasticity Estimation, and Salience Effects", University of California at Berkeley.
  • 8Gerd Gigerenzer, 2010,"Moral Satisficing: Rethinking Moral Behavior as Bounded Rationality", Topics in Cognitive Science, 2.
  • 9Herbert Siman, 1956, "A Comparison of game theory and learning theory." Psychometrika, Spring, Vol. 21(3), september.
  • 10Herbert Siman, 1957, "Amounts of firation and discovery in maze leanaing behavior. " Psychometrika, Spring, Vol. 21 (3) , september.

同被引文献131

引证文献16

二级引证文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部