摘要
在我国,尚未专章设置关于旅游合同违约责任中非财产损害赔偿的条款,学说理论对此已展开激烈的争论,肯定的呼声越来越高涨。司法实践中亦有判例对旅客的非财产性损害通过违约责任的途径加以赔偿。旅游合同是以追求精神享受为目的的特殊合同,旅行社的违约行为使得旅游者这一期待利益落空时,财产损害赔偿并不足以保护旅游者的权益。在旅游合同违约责任中规定非财产损害赔偿则能够更加全面的保护旅游者的权益。
In our country,the civil theory has not yet set the chapter on tourism in liability for breach of contract for non-pecuniary damages,but a heated argument on this theory must be increasingly rising.Jurisprudence compensates passenger through non-property damage liability approach in judicial practice.The travel contract is to pursue the spirit to enjoy a special contract for the purpose of the travel agency's breach making tourists this expectation interest,property damages is not sufficient to protect the interests of tourists.In the travel contract breach in the non-property damages is able to more fully protect tourists ' interests.
出处
《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2011年第3期15-22,共8页
Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词
旅游合同
预期利益
精神损害
非财产损害
The travel contract
The expected benefits
Spiritual damage
Non-property damage