期刊文献+

Delphi法在急性缺血中风临床路径诊疗方案中的可靠性分析 被引量:3

Reliability Analysis of Delphi Method in the Treatment Program of Acute Ischemic Stroke Clinical Pathway
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验Delphi法在构建急性缺血中风临床路径诊疗方案中的可靠性。方法:确定急性缺血中风临床路径诊疗方案关键问题项目,建立咨询问卷,选择的专家涉及中医内科临床、中西医结合临床及基础、西医临床三个领域,地区涉及华北、华南、华中、华西、华东各地区,具有较好领域代表性及地区代表性。采用Delphi法对33名专家进行2轮调查,用积极系数、权威程度和协调系数检验专家咨询的可靠性。结果:专家总体权威系数0.84,第1、2轮专家咨询积极系数为分别为100%,91%。第1、2轮专家咨询W值分别在0.151~0.329及0.187~0.412。结论:专家意见协调性好,对评估的内容及关键问题的权威程度高,对于指标的重要性意见比较统一,预测结果可取。 Objective: To verify the credibility of Delphi method in the construction of clinical pathway of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: A consultative questionnaire of clinical pathway of ischemic stroke about the key problems was set up. The chosen experts who are specialized in internal medicine of Chinese medicine, basic and clinical medicine of Chinese medicine and western medicine, and clinical medicine of western medicine, came from North China, South China, Central China, West China, East China. They are representative of various specialties and regions. After two-round performance of Delphi method on 33 experts, the positive coefficient, authoritative coefficient and Kendall coefficient were adopted to test the credibility of this study. Results: The total authoritative coefficient was 0.84. The positive coefficients of the first round and the second round were 100% and 91% respectively. The Kendall' s coefficient of the first round and the secondd round were 0.151 - 0.329 and 0.187 - 0.412 respectively. Conclusion: The concordances among the experts are good and the authoritative level of the evaluation content and the key problems is high in the study of clinical pathway of ischemic stroke about the key problems. And the suggestion of the importance of the index is consistent, which will bring reasonable results.
机构地区 广东省中医院
出处 《新中医》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第6期14-16,共3页 New Chinese Medicine
基金 国家中医药管理局公益性行业科研专项(编号:200707004) 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划资助项目(编号:2006BAI21B04)
关键词 急性缺血中风 德尔菲法 权威程度 肯德尔和谐系数 临床路径 Acute Ischemic Stroke., Delphi Method Authoritative Level Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance Clinical Pathway
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

共引文献196

同被引文献31

  • 1汪洋,熊京,吴河水,张进祥.乌司他丁对蝮蛇咬伤患者肝肾功能的保护作用[J].中国急救医学,2004,24(7):538-539. 被引量:7
  • 2杨洪艳,王小云,聂广宁,赵春梅,张春玲,成方平.Delphi法在绝经综合征评定量表指标筛选中的应用[J].南方医科大学学报,2007,27(4):562-564. 被引量:22
  • 3曾光 李辉.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1996.229.
  • 4Filll A,Kosecof J,Chassin M,et al.Consensus methods:characteristics and guidelines for use[J].Am J Public Health,1984,74(9):979-983.
  • 5Pelletier D,Dufield C,Adams A,et al.Australian nurse educators identify gaps in expert practice[J].J Contin Edu Nurs,2000,31 (5):224-231.
  • 6Kors JA,Sittig AC,Bemmel JH.The Delphi method to validate diagnostic knowledge in computerized ECG interpretation[J].Methods Inf Med,1990,29(1):44-50.
  • 7Brook RH,Kamberg CJ.Appropriateness of the use of cardiovascular procedures:a method and results of this application[J].Schweiz Med Wochenschr,1993,123(7):249-253.
  • 8Armstrong AE,Parsons S,Barker PJ.An inquiry into moral virtues,especially compassion,in psychimric nurses:findings from a Delphi study[J].J Psychiatry Ment Health Nurs,2000,7(4):297-305.
  • 9Gregg CF,Nancy MA,Anne B.Improving evidence-based care for heart failure in outpatient cardiology practices:primary results of the registry to improve the use of evidencebased heart failure therapies in the outpatient setting[J].Circulation,2010,122:585.
  • 10Gurzick M,Kesten K S. The impact of clinical nurse specialists on clinical pathways in the application of evidence-based practice[J].{H}Journal of Professional Nursing,2010,(01):42-48.

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部