期刊文献+

半乳化和非乳化双相漱口水清除口臭效果的比较研究

Anti-oral malodor efficacy comparison of a partially emulsified and a non-emulsified two-phase mounthrinse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较非乳化、半乳化双相漱口水和氯己定漱口水对口臭的治疗效果。方法:将52例受试者随机分入安慰剂组、氯己定组、半乳化组和乳化组,采用嗅觉法计分和检测挥发性硫化物(VSC)水平评估1周内的抗口臭和VSC水平效果。结果:第1、3天氯己定组、半乳化组和乳化组的抗口臭和降低VSC水平的效果比安慰剂组强(P<0.01),而在第5、7天的效果与安慰剂组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:非乳化、半乳化双相漱口水和氯己定漱口水在短期内显著缓解口臭和降低挥发性硫化物水平,要取得长期缓解可能需要与其他清洁舌背的措施相结合。 Objective: To evaluate anti-oral malodor effects of partially emulsified and a non-emulsified two-phase mounthrinse and chlorhexidine.Methods: Fifty two subjects were randomly assigned into placebo group,chlorhexidine group,partially emulsified mounthrinse group and non-emulsified mounthrinse group.The organoleptic score and volatile sulfur compound(VSC) level were used to evaluate the effects at day 1,3,5 and 7 of treatment.Results: All experimental groups shower lower organoleptic scores and volatile sulfur compound(VSC) levels at day 1,3,compared with placebo control group.While the difference in anti-oral malodor effects between the experimental group and control group was not significant at day 5 and 7 of the treatment.Conclusions: partially emulsified and a non-emulsified two-phase mounthrinse and chlorhexidine all are all effective in reducing organoleptic scores and VSC levels in the short term,but long term effects requires combination with other treatment.
出处 《海南医学院学报》 CAS 2011年第5期669-671,共3页 Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金 海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目(0020110165)
关键词 口臭 乳化 漱口水 口腔卫生 Oral malodor Emulsification Mouthrinse Oral hygiene
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Van den Velde S, Van Steenberghe D, Van Hee P,et al. Detection of odorous compounds in breath[J]. J Dent Res, 2009, 88(3): 285- 289.
  • 2Loesehe WJ, Kazor C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosis [J]. Periodontology,2000, 2002, 28: 256-279.
  • 3Casemiro LA, Martins CH, de Carvalho TC, et al Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota [J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2008, 16: 271- 274.
  • 4Rosenberg M, Gelernter H, Barki M, et al. Day-long reduction of oral malod or by a two-phase oil: water mouthrinse as compared to chlorhexidine and placebo rinses [J]. J Periodontol, 1992, 63:39- 43.
  • 5Kozlovsky A, Goldberg S, Natour I, et al. Efficacy of a 2-phase oil: water mouthrinse in controlling oral realodor, gingivitis, and plaque [J]. J Periodontol, 1996, 67:577-582.
  • 6De Boever EH , Loesche WJ. Assessing the contribution of anaerobic microflora of the tongue to oral malodor [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1995, 126:1384- 1393.
  • 7Yaegaki K , Sanada K. Biochemical and clinical factors influencing oral malodor in periodontal patients [J]. J Periodontol, 1992, 63:783- 789.
  • 8Bosy A, Kulkarni GV, Rosenberg M, et al. Relationship of oral malodor to periodontitis: evidence of independenceindiscretesubpopulations [J]. J Periodontol, 1994, 65 : 37-46.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部