《荷塘月色》解读中的“意图谬误”

"The Intention Fallacy" in the Interpreting "Lotus Pond"

迄今为止,在众多《荷塘月色》的解读文章中,"作者中心论"一直被作为其最重要的理论基础,许多研究者把追寻作者的"原意"作为解读最主要的目标。而事实上,文学文本是开放的,对作者"原意"的追逐是一种典型的"意图谬误"。数十年来,众多研究者之所以热衷于在《荷塘月色》中解读作者的"原意",与这篇散文的结构有很大关系,即整个文本有一个类似"谜语"的结构;文中的写景是"谜面",而作者面对"荷塘月色"的"心情"则构成了某种"谜底";于是很多研究者联系朱自清当时的政治、生活处境给出了多种解释。《荷塘月色》其实就是一篇出色的写景散文,回到对作品的审美欣赏才是文章解读的正确方向。

So far,among the articles of the interpreting ＂Lotus Pond＂,＂the central theory＂ has been regarded as the most important theory.Many researchers regarded the pursuit of ＂original intention＂ of the author as the most important goals of interpretation.In fact,the literary text is open and permissive.The pursuit of ＂the original intention＂ of author is a typical ＂intention fallacy＂.For decades,many researchers have been enthusiastic about interpreting the author＇s ＂original intention＂ in the ＂Lotus Pond＂,which is related to the structure of this essay,that is,the entire text has a structure similar to ＂riddle＂;the scenery in the text is the ＂question of the riddle＂;the author＇s ＂feeling＂ of facing ＂Lotus Pond＂ constitutes a kind of ＂answer to the riddle＂.As a result,many reseachers contacted Zhu Ziqing＇s political and life situations and gave a variety of explanations.＂Lotus Pond＂ is actually an excellent prose.Return to the aesthetic appreciation of the works is factally the correct direction to the interpretation of the article.