1Kovacs P,Matyas S,Boda K,et al.The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome[J].Hum Reprod,2003,18(11):2337-2341.
2Maugey-Laulom B,Commenges-Ducos M,Jullien V,et al.Endometrial vascularity and ongoing pregnancy after IVF[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2002,104(2):137-143.
3Dietterich C,Check JH,Choe JK,et al.Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J].Fertil Steril,2002,77(4):781-786.
4Baruffi RL,Contart P,Mauri AL,et al.A uterine ultrasonographic scoring systerm as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2002,19(3):99-102.
5Jayaprakasan K,Hilwah N,Kendall NR,et al.Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment?[J].Hum Reprod,2007,22(7):1932-1941.
6Jarvela IY,Sladkevicius P,Tekay ALL,et al.Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume,gray-scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2003,21(3):277-282.
7Damon VB,Bessai K,Gregor J.Einsatz der sonographie bei der implantation[J].Zentralbl Gynakol,2001,123(6):340-343.
8Bassil S.Changes in endometrial thickness,width,length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2001,18(3):258-263.
3Mamdoh A Eskandar,Ahmed M Abou-Setta,Mohamed El-Amin,Mona A Almushait,Adekunle A Sobande.Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction[J].Reproductive BioMedicine Online.2007(3)
4BAJT Visschers,RSGM Bots,MF Peeters,BWJ Mol,HJHM van Dessel.Removal of cervical mucus: effect on pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI[J].Reproductive BioMedicine Online.2007(3)