期刊文献+

机用ProTaper锉临床折断情况分析 被引量:5

Clinical Analysis of the Separation of the Rotary ProTaper Nickel-Titanium Files during Root Canal Therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨机用ProTaper锉临床折断的特点,以期为临床治疗提供指导。方法收集患者500例,磨牙850颗,共2 750个根管,使用机用ProTaper锉进行根管预备。治疗后登记ProTaper锉使用次数,进行分类,根管显微镜下观察锉变形及折断情况并进行统计学分析。结果在预备40个根管前均无ProTaper锉发生变形与折断,折断与变形多发生于预备50个根管后,锉的折断率随预备根管数目的增多而增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);4只常用ProTaper锉折断情况:F1最易折断,共6支,F2次之,S2最不易折断,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6支ProTaper锉中S1最易发生肉眼可见的变形,F3次之,SX、S2、F1、F2显微镜下也不易发现明显的变形,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论机用ProTaper锉临床使用时多折断于根尖区3 mm,变形多发生在S1和F3,术前应仔细检查器械是否有肉眼可见的缺陷,并严格记录预备的根管数目。 Objective To analyze the characteristics of the separation of the rotary ProTaper Nickel-Titanium files.Methods In 4 years,2 750 root canals of 850 molars in 500 patients were instrumented by rotary ProTaper Nickel-Titanium files.After recording the times of application and classifying the used files,the separation and the distortion of the files were observed under dental microscope.Results All the root canal files had no separation and distortion before 40 root canals were instrumented.Most separation and distortion appeared after 50 root canals were instrumented.More canals were prepared,the rate of separate files were growed,the difference was significant(P0.05).Among all files,totally 6 F1 files separated and was the easiest one.The next one is F2.S2 was the last one.The difference was significant(P0.05).S1 was the easiest distorted among all the files by naked eyes.The next one is F3.SX,S2,F1,F2 weren't detected obvious distortion by dental microscope.The difference was significant(P0.05).Conclusion The rotary ProTaper Nickel-Titanium files can prepare root canals effectively and safely.Meanwhile,the problem of instrument separation and distortion should be prevented.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2011年第4期177-180,共4页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
关键词 机用ProTaper锉 根管治疗 器械折断 Rotary ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments Root canal treatment Instrument separation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1樊明文.牙体牙髓炳学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:230.
  • 2郭继华,彭彬,范兵,边专.镍钛合金器械预备弯曲根管的临床评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2001,36(6). 被引量:21
  • 3Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper endodontie system: geometries, features and guidelines for use. Dent Today, 2001,20(10) :60-67.
  • 4Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod, 1995, 21(4) :173-176.
  • 5Deplazes P, Peters O,Barbakow F. Comparing apical preparation of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickeltitanium hand instruments. J Endod, 2001,27 (3) :196-202.
  • 6Buchanan LS. The standardized-taper root canal preparation-Part 1. Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. Int Endod J, 2000,33(6) :516-529.
  • 7何奎芳,金向青,潘乙怀,亓庆国.手用ProTaper镍钛锉临床折断原因的初步分析[J].口腔医学,2009,29(11):598-600. 被引量:5
  • 8Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case diagnosis: a clinieal investigation. J Am Dent Assoc, 1970,80(6) : 1341-1347.
  • 9夏宁,赵心臣,高小燕.根管治疗中75例器械折断的临床分析[J].口腔医学纵横,1999,15(2):103-105. 被引量:26

二级参考文献13

共引文献49

同被引文献79

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部