CT监视和CT引导下颅内血肿穿刺术感染率比较

Comparison of infection rate between CT monitored and CT guided craniopuncture

目的:比较CT监视和CT引导下颅内血肿穿刺术后感染率。方法:采用卡方检验,比较2006年1月-2010年1月期间在我科接受CT监视和CT引导下颅内血肿穿刺术449例术后感染率。结果:CT引导下穿刺术后感染率为2.1%,CT监视下穿刺术后感染率为2.8%,两者无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:和CT引导相比,CT监视下颅内血肿穿刺术并不增加感染率,是一种安全、有效的手术方法,尤其适用于在基层医院推广使用。

Objective：To compare the infection rate of CT monitored with CT guided craniopuncture on treatment of intracranial hematoma.Methods：Data of 499 patients who accepted CT monitored and CT guided Craniopuncture on treatment of intracranial hematoma were collected from 2006.1 to 2010.1 about infection rate.Results：The infection rate of CT guided craniopuncture was 2.1% while the CT monitored craniopuncture was 2.8%,（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The infection rate between CT monitored and CT guided craniopuncture is not different.CT monitored craniopuncture is more effective and safer,and especially fitly used at basic level hospitals.