期刊文献+

基金经理的运气是否比能力更重要? 被引量:6

Is luck more important than the fund managers ability?
原文传递
导出
摘要 区别于传统的基金经理能力的评价方法,首次采用随机最优前沿模型(stochastic frontier model)的思想,将基金的收益分解为三方面因素的共同作用:市场收益水平,基金经理的能力,以及基金经理的运气,以分析基金经理的能力与运气在不同管理时限内对基金收益的贡献水平.通过对中国基金市场的17支开放式股票型基金在2005年6月1日至2008年10月14日的日度数据进行分析,实证结果表明:相对于牛市,经理的能力在熊市中会发挥更大的作用并在更短的时间内,即3个月左右,成为基金收益的主导因素.同时,随着基金管理时间的增长,经理能力的贡献越来越显著.首次从基金业绩中分解出运气和基金管理能力各自的贡献,为认识基金经理的表现提供了一个新的视角和维度. This paper firstly uses the method of stochastic frontier model which is quite different with the traditionM methods in evaluating fund managers professional ability. We divide funds yield performance into three leading factors: benchmark yield, fund manager's ability, and their luck. We use the daily data of 17 open-ended mutual funds from 2005.6.1 to 2008.10.14, and mark 2007.10.17 as the turning point of bull market with bear market. The results show that, in bear market, fund managers abilities contribute more to their performance than in bull market; and generally, their abilities get more and more effective than their luck as time goes on. This research originally separates luck and managers abilities from funds performance, so as to offer a new point of view to evaluate the fund manager's performance.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期834-840,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70801006) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
关键词 随机最优前沿模型 面板数据 能力 运气 stochastic frontier model panel data ability luck
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Treynor J, Mazuy K. Can mutual funds outguess the market[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1966, 44:131 136.
  • 2Henriksson R, Merton R. On market timing and investment performance II: Statistical procedures for evaluating forecasting skills[J]. Journal of Business, 1981, 54(4): 513-533.
  • 3Bhattacharya S, Pfleiderer P. A note on performance evaluation[R]. Technical Report, 1983, 714.
  • 4Chang E C, Lewellen W C. Market timing and mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Business, 1984, 57: 57-72.
  • 5Goetzmann W N, Ingersoll J, Ivkovic Z. Monthly measurement of daily timers[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000, 35: 257-290.
  • 6Fama E F, French K R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56.
  • 7Carhart M. On persistence in mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 50: 57-82.
  • 8Grinblatt M, Titman S. Performance persistence in mutual funds[J]. Journal of Finance, 1992, 47: 1977-1984.
  • 9吴启芳,汪寿阳.证券投资基金业绩评价中的几个基本问题[J].管理评论,2003,15(3):22-28. 被引量:11
  • 10赵秀娟,张洪水,黎建强,汪寿阳.一个基于非对称Laplace分布和DEA的证券投资基金评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(10):1-10. 被引量:13

二级参考文献145

共引文献104

同被引文献113

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部