国际商会在中国内地仲裁:准入、裁决国籍及执行——由宁波中院的一份裁定谈起

On Authorization,Nationality and Enforcement of ICC Awards Made in China's Mainland:Reflections from the Ningbo Intermediate Court's Ruling

国际商会可否在中国内地仲裁,其裁决应如何认定及执行,在中国仲裁界备受争议。通过对宁波中院有关裁定的分析,可发现其在裁判逻辑、法律适用与解释上的不足。该裁定将国际商会在中国内地所作裁决认定为非内国裁决,依据《纽约公约》承认与执行的做法,未从根本上解决此类裁决的国籍问题,并与我国加入公约时的互惠保留相违背。考虑此类实践难题的化解,以及近期我国司法实践的发展动向,我国仲裁立法亟待明确以仲裁地作为裁决国籍的认定标准。

It is a highly disputed issue that where the International Chamber of Commerce can make arbitral awards in China mainland,as well as the nationality and enforcement of this kind of awards.Through analysis on the recent Ningbo Intermediate Court＇s ruling,the court＇s weaknesses in adjudicate reasoning,law application and legal construction could be observed.The ruling recognized the ICC award made in China mainland as a non-domestic award under the New York Convention.This approach is unable to resolve the nationality issue about the award,and conflicts with the reciprocity reservation China made when acceding to the Convention.Considering the resolution of this complex problem,and the newest orientation in China＇s judicial practices,the related arbitral legislation is desired to be revised and make clear the seat of arbitration criterion about the nationality of awards.